Clausewitz and the Ethics of Armed Force: Five Propositions

Paul Cornish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The work of Carl von Clausewitz continues to provoke heated debate. For some scholars, Clausewitz's On War remains indispensable to serious thought on the resort to war in the modern period. Others, however, see Clausewitz's work as either outdated, or a morally repellent argument for unlimited, unrestrained and brutal warfare. This essay argues not only that Clausewitz's work continues to be relevant to discussions on the use of armed force, but also that On War provides a framework for ethical reflection on war and its conduct. Two main preoccupations of western military academies and staff colleges--Clausewitz on the one hand, and the just war tradition on the other--can complement, rather than rival each other. On War creates a space for reflection on the use of armed force, and for that reason if no other, should still be considered an important resource for contemporary students and practitioners of strategy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-226
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Military Ethics
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2003

Fingerprint

military
moral philosophy
warfare
academy
Clausewitz
Armed Forces
Military
staff
resources
student

Cite this

Clausewitz and the Ethics of Armed Force: Five Propositions. / Cornish, Paul.

In: Journal of Military Ethics, Vol. 2, No. 3, 11.2003, p. 213-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cornish, Paul. / Clausewitz and the Ethics of Armed Force: Five Propositions. In: Journal of Military Ethics. 2003 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 213-226.
@article{a206f5e819ff4d848c110e5f078cc90f,
title = "Clausewitz and the Ethics of Armed Force: Five Propositions",
abstract = "The work of Carl von Clausewitz continues to provoke heated debate. For some scholars, Clausewitz's On War remains indispensable to serious thought on the resort to war in the modern period. Others, however, see Clausewitz's work as either outdated, or a morally repellent argument for unlimited, unrestrained and brutal warfare. This essay argues not only that Clausewitz's work continues to be relevant to discussions on the use of armed force, but also that On War provides a framework for ethical reflection on war and its conduct. Two main preoccupations of western military academies and staff colleges--Clausewitz on the one hand, and the just war tradition on the other--can complement, rather than rival each other. On War creates a space for reflection on the use of armed force, and for that reason if no other, should still be considered an important resource for contemporary students and practitioners of strategy.",
author = "Paul Cornish",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/15027570310000676",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "213--226",
journal = "Journal of Military Ethics",
issn = "1502-7570",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clausewitz and the Ethics of Armed Force: Five Propositions

AU - Cornish, Paul

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - The work of Carl von Clausewitz continues to provoke heated debate. For some scholars, Clausewitz's On War remains indispensable to serious thought on the resort to war in the modern period. Others, however, see Clausewitz's work as either outdated, or a morally repellent argument for unlimited, unrestrained and brutal warfare. This essay argues not only that Clausewitz's work continues to be relevant to discussions on the use of armed force, but also that On War provides a framework for ethical reflection on war and its conduct. Two main preoccupations of western military academies and staff colleges--Clausewitz on the one hand, and the just war tradition on the other--can complement, rather than rival each other. On War creates a space for reflection on the use of armed force, and for that reason if no other, should still be considered an important resource for contemporary students and practitioners of strategy.

AB - The work of Carl von Clausewitz continues to provoke heated debate. For some scholars, Clausewitz's On War remains indispensable to serious thought on the resort to war in the modern period. Others, however, see Clausewitz's work as either outdated, or a morally repellent argument for unlimited, unrestrained and brutal warfare. This essay argues not only that Clausewitz's work continues to be relevant to discussions on the use of armed force, but also that On War provides a framework for ethical reflection on war and its conduct. Two main preoccupations of western military academies and staff colleges--Clausewitz on the one hand, and the just war tradition on the other--can complement, rather than rival each other. On War creates a space for reflection on the use of armed force, and for that reason if no other, should still be considered an important resource for contemporary students and practitioners of strategy.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15027570310000676

U2 - 10.1080/15027570310000676

DO - 10.1080/15027570310000676

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 213

EP - 226

JO - Journal of Military Ethics

JF - Journal of Military Ethics

SN - 1502-7570

IS - 3

ER -