Choosing what (not) to do next: a preliminary theoretical framework on strategic innovation in terrorist organizations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (SciVal)

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretical framework on strategic innovation in terrorist organizations. By comparing three historical organizations (ETA, PIRA, and Red Brigades), it seeks to understand the rationale and dynamics of strategic innovation. In doing so, it delineates this phenomenon as a process articulated in four stages: Evaluation, Formulation, Adoption, and Implementation. While the first two stages involve different actors, leadership is crucial during the stages of Adoption and Implementation. Additionally, the framework discusses how innovation is not necessarily related to escalations in violence and highlights an important difference between strategic change and strategic innovation. Finally, the paper explores the role of culture to then suggest areas for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages22
JournalDynamics of Asymmetric Conflict : Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide
Volume17
Issue number1
Early online date24 Nov 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

No funding acknowleged

Keywords

  • Political violence
  • asymmetric conflict
  • ethnopolitical conflict
  • extremism
  • terrorism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Law
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing what (not) to do next: a preliminary theoretical framework on strategic innovation in terrorist organizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this