Abstract
This paper presents a theoretical framework on strategic innovation in terrorist organizations. By comparing three historical organizations (ETA, PIRA, and Red Brigades), it seeks to understand the rationale and dynamics of strategic innovation. In doing so, it delineates this phenomenon as a process articulated in four stages: Evaluation, Formulation, Adoption, and Implementation. While the first two stages involve different actors, leadership is crucial during the stages of Adoption and Implementation. Additionally, the framework discusses how innovation is not necessarily related to escalations in violence and highlights an important difference between strategic change and strategic innovation. Finally, the paper explores the role of culture to then suggest areas for future research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-22 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict : Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 24 Nov 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 Jan 2024 |
Bibliographical note
No funding acknowlegedKeywords
- Political violence
- asymmetric conflict
- ethnopolitical conflict
- extremism
- terrorism
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cultural Studies
- Social Psychology
- Law
- Political Science and International Relations
- Sociology and Political Science