Choosing between conciliatory and oppositional leaders: The role of out-group signals and in-group leader candidates’ collective action tactics

Leda Blackwood, Winnifred R. Louis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
66 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper we examine the role of out-group signals and in-group leader tactics in the choice and evaluation of rival in-group leader candidates. Study 1 found preference for a negotiating in-group leader over an oppositional leader, mediated by perceived leader effectiveness and prototypicality. In Study 2 participants chose a leader who had received out-group endorsement and in Studies 3 and 4, participants chose a negotiating in-group leader where the out-group was prepared to negotiate and an oppositional leader where the out-group was not prepared to negotiate. In the latter three studies, there was evidence for participants being strategic in their choices: effects were mediated by effectiveness but not prototypicality. These findings suggest our understanding of collective action will be enriched through attention to the situational cues provided by out-groups, and to the context of competing voices of collective action leadership.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)320-336
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume47
Issue number3
Early online date26 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing between conciliatory and oppositional leaders: The role of out-group signals and in-group leader candidates’ collective action tactics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this