Abstract
We present the results of our multiwavelength (X-ray to radio) follow-up campaign of the Einstein Probe transient EP240408a. The initial 10 s trigger displayed bright soft X-ray (0.5-4 keV) radiation with peak luminosity LX ≳ 1049 (1050) erg s−1 for an assumed redshift z ≳ 0.5 (2.0). The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory and Neutron star Interior Composition ExploreR discovered a fading X-ray counterpart lasting for ∼5 days (observer frame), which showed a long-lived (∼4 days) plateau-like emission (t−0.5) before a sharp power-law decline (t−7). The plateau emission was in excess of LX ≳ 1046 (1047) erg s−1 at z ≳ 0.5 (2.0). Deep optical and radio observations resulted in nondetections of the transient. Our observations with Gemini South revealed a faint potential host galaxy (r ≈ 24 AB mag) near the edge of the X-ray localization. The faint candidate host, and lack of other potential hosts (r ≳ 26 AB mag; J ≳ 23 AB mag), imply a higher redshift origin (z ≳ 0.5), which produces extreme X-ray properties that are inconsistent with many known extragalactic transient classes. In particular, the lack of a bright gamma-ray counterpart, with the isotropic-equivalent energy (10-10,000 keV) constrained by GECam and Konus-Wind to Eγ,iso ≲ 4 × 1050 (6 × 1051) erg at z ≈ 0.5 (2.0), conflicts with known gamma-ray bursts of similar X-ray luminosities. We therefore favor a jetted tidal disruption event as the progenitor of EP240408a at z ≳ 1.0, possibly caused by the disruption of a white dwarf by an intermediate-mass black hole. The alternative is that EP240408a may represent a new, previously unknown class of transient.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | L30 |
Journal | Astrophysical Journal Letters |
Volume | 979 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 27 Jan 2025 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2025 |
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the EP team, in particular Nanda Rea, Weimin Yuan, Wenda Zhang, and Chichuan Jin, for useful discussions. The authors acknowledge Jimmy DeLaunay regarding Swift/BAT and Fermi/GBM, Gaurav Waratkar regarding AstroSat/CZTI, and Dmitry Svinkin regarding Konus-Wind. B. O. acknowledges useful discussions with Phil Evans regarding the XRT data, Kathleen Labrie regarding the Gemini data, and Gourav Khullar and Anna O'Grady regarding the interpretation of the optical spectra. J. H. thanks George Younes for useful discussions on the nature of the source.Funding
B. O. is supported by the McWilliams Postdoctoral Fellowship at Carnegie Mellon University. J. H. acknowledges support from NASA under award number 80GSFC21M0002. P. B. is supported by a grant (no. 2020747) from the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF), Jerusalem, Israel, by a grant (no. 1649/23) from the Israel Science Foundation and by a grant (no. 80NSSC 24K0770) from the NASA astrophysics theory program. M.N. is a Fonds de Recherche du Quebec—Nature et Technologies (FRQNT) postdoctoral fellow. S. S. is partially supported by LBNL Subcontract 7707915. G. B. acknowledges funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 program under the AHEAD2020 project (grant agreement no. 871158). Research at Perimeter Institute is supported in part by the Government of Canada through the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development and by the Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Colleges and Universities.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Space and Planetary Science