Characterising influences on safety culture in military aviation

a methodologically grounded approach

Anthea Bennett, Elizabeth Hellier, Andrew Weyman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Historically, much effort has been expended in safety culture / climate research toward identifying a generic core set of components, predominately using the self-administered questionnaire approach. However, no stable unified model has emerged, and much of this research has taken a methodologically top-down approach to depicting organisational safety culture. In light of this, the benefits of qualitative exploration as a precursor to and foundation for the development of quantitative climate measures are increasingly recognised. When grounded in the viewpoint of employees, qualitative data driven techniques can provide an insight into how those within an organisation make sense of their work environment and how this impacts their understanding of safety. The current research aimed to address issues of ecological validity by using a qualitative approach to exploring and characterising military aviation employee perspectives on safety culture and risk taking prior to development of a quantitative measurement tool. A thematic analysis of twelve focus groups (N=89),conducted with military employees in a semi-structured manner, was undertaken. This insight into how these personnel interpret their working world was characterised by six nameable constructs: 1. Policy and procedures, 2. Pressure, 3. Management ownership of safety, 4. Individual responsibility and risk perception, 5. Communication and 6. Organisational commitment. Interpretation of these constructs and implications for the future development of a quantitative measurment tool are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Human Factor and Ergonomics Society (Europe, 2016)
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2015

Fingerprint

air traffic
Military
employee
climate
work environment
personnel
commitment
responsibility
interpretation
questionnaire
communication
management
Group

Cite this

Bennett, A., Hellier, E., & Weyman, A. (Accepted/In press). Characterising influences on safety culture in military aviation: a methodologically grounded approach. In Proceedings of the Human Factor and Ergonomics Society (Europe, 2016)

Characterising influences on safety culture in military aviation : a methodologically grounded approach. / Bennett, Anthea; Hellier, Elizabeth; Weyman, Andrew.

Proceedings of the Human Factor and Ergonomics Society (Europe, 2016). 2015.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Bennett, A, Hellier, E & Weyman, A 2015, Characterising influences on safety culture in military aviation: a methodologically grounded approach. in Proceedings of the Human Factor and Ergonomics Society (Europe, 2016).
Bennett A, Hellier E, Weyman A. Characterising influences on safety culture in military aviation: a methodologically grounded approach. In Proceedings of the Human Factor and Ergonomics Society (Europe, 2016). 2015
Bennett, Anthea ; Hellier, Elizabeth ; Weyman, Andrew. / Characterising influences on safety culture in military aviation : a methodologically grounded approach. Proceedings of the Human Factor and Ergonomics Society (Europe, 2016). 2015.
@inproceedings{eb6c34f7a8ee4a6db8fd2a41eda1e526,
title = "Characterising influences on safety culture in military aviation: a methodologically grounded approach",
abstract = "Historically, much effort has been expended in safety culture / climate research toward identifying a generic core set of components, predominately using the self-administered questionnaire approach. However, no stable unified model has emerged, and much of this research has taken a methodologically top-down approach to depicting organisational safety culture. In light of this, the benefits of qualitative exploration as a precursor to and foundation for the development of quantitative climate measures are increasingly recognised. When grounded in the viewpoint of employees, qualitative data driven techniques can provide an insight into how those within an organisation make sense of their work environment and how this impacts their understanding of safety. The current research aimed to address issues of ecological validity by using a qualitative approach to exploring and characterising military aviation employee perspectives on safety culture and risk taking prior to development of a quantitative measurement tool. A thematic analysis of twelve focus groups (N=89),conducted with military employees in a semi-structured manner, was undertaken. This insight into how these personnel interpret their working world was characterised by six nameable constructs: 1. Policy and procedures, 2. Pressure, 3. Management ownership of safety, 4. Individual responsibility and risk perception, 5. Communication and 6. Organisational commitment. Interpretation of these constructs and implications for the future development of a quantitative measurment tool are discussed.",
author = "Anthea Bennett and Elizabeth Hellier and Andrew Weyman",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Human Factor and Ergonomics Society (Europe, 2016)",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Characterising influences on safety culture in military aviation

T2 - a methodologically grounded approach

AU - Bennett, Anthea

AU - Hellier, Elizabeth

AU - Weyman, Andrew

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Historically, much effort has been expended in safety culture / climate research toward identifying a generic core set of components, predominately using the self-administered questionnaire approach. However, no stable unified model has emerged, and much of this research has taken a methodologically top-down approach to depicting organisational safety culture. In light of this, the benefits of qualitative exploration as a precursor to and foundation for the development of quantitative climate measures are increasingly recognised. When grounded in the viewpoint of employees, qualitative data driven techniques can provide an insight into how those within an organisation make sense of their work environment and how this impacts their understanding of safety. The current research aimed to address issues of ecological validity by using a qualitative approach to exploring and characterising military aviation employee perspectives on safety culture and risk taking prior to development of a quantitative measurement tool. A thematic analysis of twelve focus groups (N=89),conducted with military employees in a semi-structured manner, was undertaken. This insight into how these personnel interpret their working world was characterised by six nameable constructs: 1. Policy and procedures, 2. Pressure, 3. Management ownership of safety, 4. Individual responsibility and risk perception, 5. Communication and 6. Organisational commitment. Interpretation of these constructs and implications for the future development of a quantitative measurment tool are discussed.

AB - Historically, much effort has been expended in safety culture / climate research toward identifying a generic core set of components, predominately using the self-administered questionnaire approach. However, no stable unified model has emerged, and much of this research has taken a methodologically top-down approach to depicting organisational safety culture. In light of this, the benefits of qualitative exploration as a precursor to and foundation for the development of quantitative climate measures are increasingly recognised. When grounded in the viewpoint of employees, qualitative data driven techniques can provide an insight into how those within an organisation make sense of their work environment and how this impacts their understanding of safety. The current research aimed to address issues of ecological validity by using a qualitative approach to exploring and characterising military aviation employee perspectives on safety culture and risk taking prior to development of a quantitative measurement tool. A thematic analysis of twelve focus groups (N=89),conducted with military employees in a semi-structured manner, was undertaken. This insight into how these personnel interpret their working world was characterised by six nameable constructs: 1. Policy and procedures, 2. Pressure, 3. Management ownership of safety, 4. Individual responsibility and risk perception, 5. Communication and 6. Organisational commitment. Interpretation of these constructs and implications for the future development of a quantitative measurment tool are discussed.

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - Proceedings of the Human Factor and Ergonomics Society (Europe, 2016)

ER -