Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Challenges of achieving good environmental status in the Northeast Atlantic

  • Karen A. Alexander
  • , Peter Kershaw
  • , Philip Cooper
  • , Alison J. Gilbert
  • , Jason M. Hall-Spencer
  • , Johanna J. Heymans
  • , Andreas Kannen
  • , Hans J. Los
  • , Tim O'Higgins
  • , Cathal O'Mahony
  • , Paul Tett
  • , Tineke A. Troost
  • , Justus van Beusekom
  • University of Plymouth
  • University College Cork
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Deltares
  • Scottish Association for Marine Science
  • Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht
  • Universität Hamburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)
312 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The sustainable exploitation of marine ecosystem services is dependent on achieving and maintaining an adequate ecosystem state to prevent undue deterioration. Within the European Union, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) requires member states to achieve Good Environmental Status (GEnS), specified in terms of 11 descriptors. We analyzed the complexity of social-ecological factors to identify common critical issues that are likely to influence the achievement of GEnS in the Northeast Atlantic (NEA) more broadly, using three case studies. A conceptual model developed using a soft systems approach highlights the complexity of social and ecological phenomena that influence, and are likely to continue to influence, the state of ecosystems in the NEA. The development of the conceptual model raised four issues that complicate the implementation of the MSFD, the majority of which arose in the Pressures and State sections of the model: variability in the system, cumulative effects, ecosystem resilience, and conflicting policy targets. The achievement of GEnS targets for the marine environment requires the recognition and negotiation of trade-offs across a broad policy landscape involving a wide variety of stakeholders in the public and private sectors. Furthermore, potential cumulative effects may introduce uncertainty, particularly in selecting appropriate management measures. There also are endogenous pressures that society cannot control. This uncertainty is even more obvious when variability within the system, e.g., climate change, is accounted for. Also, questions related to the resilience of the affected ecosystem to specific pressures must be raised, despite a lack of current knowledge. Achieving good management and reaching GEnS require multidisciplinary assessments. The soft systems approach provides one mechanism for bringing multidisciplinary information together to look at the problems in a different light.

Original languageEnglish
Article number49
JournalEcology and Society
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  2. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Keywords

  • Sustainability
  • Good environmental status
  • Northeast atlantic
  • Soft systems methodology
  • Trade-offs
  • Ecosystem-based management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges of achieving good environmental status in the Northeast Atlantic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this