Capturing value from innovation in knowledge-intensive service firms: the role of competitive strategy

Panagiotis Desyllas, Marcela Miozzo, Hsing-fen Lee, Ian Miles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Building on a problem-solving perspective to value creation and capture, and on the business strategy literature, we argue that the actions that knowledge-intensive business service (KIBS) firms take to identify, select and solve client problems will affect their approach to capturing value from innovation. We apply regression analysis to data from an original survey involving a sample of 230 innovations introduced by 150 publicly-traded UK and US KIBS firms. Distinguishing between cost- and differentiation-oriented KIBS firms, we find that cost-oriented firms tend to place more importance on all appropriability mechanisms than do differentiation-oriented firms. Furthermore, the perceived importance of formal appropriability mechanisms, relative to that of all appropriability mechanisms, tends to be higher for cost-oriented than for differentiation-oriented firms. This association is stronger for the case of the introduction of process (rather than product) innovation. These findings contribute to the strategy and service innovation literatures, by showing that KIBS firms’ competitive strategies influence value capture, over and above the role of the innovation-, industry-, and institutional-level factors examined in earlier studies.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages27
JournalBritish Journal of Management
Early online date1 Feb 2018
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 1 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Innovation
Industry
Costs
Regression analysis
Association reactions

Cite this

Capturing value from innovation in knowledge-intensive service firms: the role of competitive strategy. / Desyllas, Panagiotis; Miozzo, Marcela; Lee, Hsing-fen; Miles, Ian .

In: British Journal of Management, 01.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Desyllas, Panagiotis; Miozzo, Marcela; Lee, Hsing-fen; Miles, Ian / Capturing value from innovation in knowledge-intensive service firms: the role of competitive strategy.

In: British Journal of Management, 01.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{308e6f1e1ff0409393066ca25080a7e1,
title = "Capturing value from innovation in knowledge-intensive service firms: the role of competitive strategy",
abstract = "Building on a problem-solving perspective to value creation and capture, and on the business strategy literature, we argue that the actions that knowledge-intensive business service (KIBS) firms take to identify, select and solve client problems will affect their approach to capturing value from innovation. We apply regression analysis to data from an original survey involving a sample of 230 innovations introduced by 150 publicly-traded UK and US KIBS firms. Distinguishing between cost- and differentiation-oriented KIBS firms, we find that cost-oriented firms tend to place more importance on all appropriability mechanisms than do differentiation-oriented firms. Furthermore, the perceived importance of formal appropriability mechanisms, relative to that of all appropriability mechanisms, tends to be higher for cost-oriented than for differentiation-oriented firms. This association is stronger for the case of the introduction of process (rather than product) innovation. These findings contribute to the strategy and service innovation literatures, by showing that KIBS firms’ competitive strategies influence value capture, over and above the role of the innovation-, industry-, and institutional-level factors examined in earlier studies.",
author = "Panagiotis Desyllas and Marcela Miozzo and Hsing-fen Lee and Ian Miles",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8551.12273",
journal = "British Journal of Management",
issn = "1045-3172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capturing value from innovation in knowledge-intensive service firms: the role of competitive strategy

AU - Desyllas,Panagiotis

AU - Miozzo,Marcela

AU - Lee,Hsing-fen

AU - Miles,Ian

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Building on a problem-solving perspective to value creation and capture, and on the business strategy literature, we argue that the actions that knowledge-intensive business service (KIBS) firms take to identify, select and solve client problems will affect their approach to capturing value from innovation. We apply regression analysis to data from an original survey involving a sample of 230 innovations introduced by 150 publicly-traded UK and US KIBS firms. Distinguishing between cost- and differentiation-oriented KIBS firms, we find that cost-oriented firms tend to place more importance on all appropriability mechanisms than do differentiation-oriented firms. Furthermore, the perceived importance of formal appropriability mechanisms, relative to that of all appropriability mechanisms, tends to be higher for cost-oriented than for differentiation-oriented firms. This association is stronger for the case of the introduction of process (rather than product) innovation. These findings contribute to the strategy and service innovation literatures, by showing that KIBS firms’ competitive strategies influence value capture, over and above the role of the innovation-, industry-, and institutional-level factors examined in earlier studies.

AB - Building on a problem-solving perspective to value creation and capture, and on the business strategy literature, we argue that the actions that knowledge-intensive business service (KIBS) firms take to identify, select and solve client problems will affect their approach to capturing value from innovation. We apply regression analysis to data from an original survey involving a sample of 230 innovations introduced by 150 publicly-traded UK and US KIBS firms. Distinguishing between cost- and differentiation-oriented KIBS firms, we find that cost-oriented firms tend to place more importance on all appropriability mechanisms than do differentiation-oriented firms. Furthermore, the perceived importance of formal appropriability mechanisms, relative to that of all appropriability mechanisms, tends to be higher for cost-oriented than for differentiation-oriented firms. This association is stronger for the case of the introduction of process (rather than product) innovation. These findings contribute to the strategy and service innovation literatures, by showing that KIBS firms’ competitive strategies influence value capture, over and above the role of the innovation-, industry-, and institutional-level factors examined in earlier studies.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8551.12273

DO - 10.1111/1467-8551.12273

M3 - Article

JO - British Journal of Management

T2 - British Journal of Management

JF - British Journal of Management

SN - 1045-3172

ER -