Abstract
We examine whether requiring (IFRS) versus
allowing (UK GAAP) conditional capitalisation of development expenditure affects
the extent to which capitalisation conveys more information about future
earnings, relative to expensing. We show that capitalisation results in current returns
incorporating more future earnings information than expensing under UK GAAP but
not under IFRS. i.e., the amount of information
incorporated into market prices of capitalisers is the same as that from firms
expensing R&D under IFRS. This result holds irrespective of a firm’s
earnings management incentives or strength of corporate governance for the
period under IFRS. We argue that this is because investors
experience greater uncertainty regarding the realisation of future economic
benefits associated with the development costs capitalised in the post-IFRS
period. Consistent with this, we do find a positive association between
capitalised R&D and future earnings variability in the post-IFRS period
only, as well as short-term positive abnormal returns for capitalisers relative
to expensers in the pre-IFRS period only. Overall, these findings suggest that when
moving from a standard that offers an overt option to capitalise or expense, capitalisation
comes with greater uncertainty, which is resolved only in the long term.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 100998 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | British Accounting Review |
Volume | 53 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 4 Mar 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Capitalisation of R&D and the informativeness of stock prices: pre and post IFRS evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
-
Fanis Tsoligkas
- Management - Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor)
- Accounting, Finance & Law
- Centre for Future of Work
- Institute of Sustainability and Climate Change
Person: Research & Teaching, Affiliate staff