Can visualization of contributions support fairness in collaboration? Findings from meters in an online game

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we consider how visualizations might support judgements about fairness in collaborative work. We present a qualitative investigation of meters, existing artefacts that enable awareness of contributions in the online game World of Warcraft. Through in-depth interviews with game players, we draw attention to the value of meters as tools for self-reflection and group evaluation. Yet we also describe problematic consequences that arise as a result of meters, distinguishing their usage as in-the-moment awareness tools from instruments used after the fact to apportion credit and blame. We argue that representations like meters may be enough to provoke initial questions about fairness, but are likely to undermine the efforts of collaborators if they fail to combine a set of indices that reflect important aspects of individual work in the context of team activity. We consider broader lessons for the way in which future designs might aim to support fairness in collaborative systems, pointing to multidimensional mechanisms adapted specifically to real-time or retrospective usage.

Conference

ConferenceThe 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
CountryUSA United States
CitySan Francisco
Period27/02/163/03/16

Fingerprint

fairness
visualization
reflexivity
credit
artifact
interview
evaluation
Values
Group
time

Cite this

Kelly, R., Watts, L., & Payne, S. (2016). Can visualization of contributions support fairness in collaboration? Findings from meters in an online game. 664-678. Paper presented at The 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, San Francisco, USA United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819977, https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819977

Can visualization of contributions support fairness in collaboration? Findings from meters in an online game. / Kelly, Ryan; Watts, Leon; Payne, Stephen.

2016. 664-678 Paper presented at The 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, San Francisco, USA United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Kelly, R, Watts, L & Payne, S 2016, 'Can visualization of contributions support fairness in collaboration? Findings from meters in an online game' Paper presented at The 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, San Francisco, USA United States, 27/02/16 - 3/03/16, pp. 664-678. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819977, https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819977
Kelly R, Watts L, Payne S. Can visualization of contributions support fairness in collaboration? Findings from meters in an online game. 2016. Paper presented at The 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, San Francisco, USA United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819977, https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819977
Kelly, Ryan ; Watts, Leon ; Payne, Stephen. / Can visualization of contributions support fairness in collaboration? Findings from meters in an online game. Paper presented at The 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, San Francisco, USA United States.15 p.
@conference{f60c0ceb3051459ab24cc502989d8804,
title = "Can visualization of contributions support fairness in collaboration? Findings from meters in an online game",
abstract = "In this paper we consider how visualizations might support judgements about fairness in collaborative work. We present a qualitative investigation of meters, existing artefacts that enable awareness of contributions in the online game World of Warcraft. Through in-depth interviews with game players, we draw attention to the value of meters as tools for self-reflection and group evaluation. Yet we also describe problematic consequences that arise as a result of meters, distinguishing their usage as in-the-moment awareness tools from instruments used after the fact to apportion credit and blame. We argue that representations like meters may be enough to provoke initial questions about fairness, but are likely to undermine the efforts of collaborators if they fail to combine a set of indices that reflect important aspects of individual work in the context of team activity. We consider broader lessons for the way in which future designs might aim to support fairness in collaborative systems, pointing to multidimensional mechanisms adapted specifically to real-time or retrospective usage.",
author = "Ryan Kelly and Leon Watts and Stephen Payne",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "27",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819977",
language = "English",
pages = "664--678",
note = "The 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing ; Conference date: 27-02-2016 Through 03-03-2016",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Can visualization of contributions support fairness in collaboration? Findings from meters in an online game

AU - Kelly, Ryan

AU - Watts, Leon

AU - Payne, Stephen

PY - 2016/2/27

Y1 - 2016/2/27

N2 - In this paper we consider how visualizations might support judgements about fairness in collaborative work. We present a qualitative investigation of meters, existing artefacts that enable awareness of contributions in the online game World of Warcraft. Through in-depth interviews with game players, we draw attention to the value of meters as tools for self-reflection and group evaluation. Yet we also describe problematic consequences that arise as a result of meters, distinguishing their usage as in-the-moment awareness tools from instruments used after the fact to apportion credit and blame. We argue that representations like meters may be enough to provoke initial questions about fairness, but are likely to undermine the efforts of collaborators if they fail to combine a set of indices that reflect important aspects of individual work in the context of team activity. We consider broader lessons for the way in which future designs might aim to support fairness in collaborative systems, pointing to multidimensional mechanisms adapted specifically to real-time or retrospective usage.

AB - In this paper we consider how visualizations might support judgements about fairness in collaborative work. We present a qualitative investigation of meters, existing artefacts that enable awareness of contributions in the online game World of Warcraft. Through in-depth interviews with game players, we draw attention to the value of meters as tools for self-reflection and group evaluation. Yet we also describe problematic consequences that arise as a result of meters, distinguishing their usage as in-the-moment awareness tools from instruments used after the fact to apportion credit and blame. We argue that representations like meters may be enough to provoke initial questions about fairness, but are likely to undermine the efforts of collaborators if they fail to combine a set of indices that reflect important aspects of individual work in the context of team activity. We consider broader lessons for the way in which future designs might aim to support fairness in collaborative systems, pointing to multidimensional mechanisms adapted specifically to real-time or retrospective usage.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819977

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819977

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819977

M3 - Paper

SP - 664

EP - 678

ER -