Abstract
The theoretical literature suggests that political ideology matters in the decision to contract out public sector services, whereas the empirical literature is divided. We seek to explain the divide in the empirical literature by providing a link from theory to our empirical analysis by describing the nature of political competition. Using the number of seats in English local government as a measure of political ideology, we find that those governments dominated by Conservative party members have a higher likelihood of contracting out, whereas the opposite is true for the Greens. We also investigate the marginal effect of a Conservative seat. Our results suggest that local governments are more likely to contract out waste management and recycling services, the greater the number of seats that are controlled by the right-wing party (Conservatives). However, an additional Conservative seat seems to have a stronger positive influence when one of the other opposition parties (the Liberal Democrats) is controlling the local legislature rather than the Conservative themselves.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 915-930 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Economics & Politics |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 12 May 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Nov 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s). Economics & Politics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from thecorresponding author upon reasonable request.
Keywords
- contracting out
- ideology
- local government
- privatization
- waste management
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can Politics Explain Contracting Out?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS