Can multi-stakeholder initiatives improve global supply chains? Improving deliberative capacity with a stakeholder orientation

Vivek Soundararajan, Jill Brown, Andrew C. Wicks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
48 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Global multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are important instruments that have the potential to improve the social and environmental sustainability of global supply chains. However, they often fail to comprehensively address the needs and interests of various supplychain participants. While voluntary in nature, MSIs have most often been implemented through coercive approaches, resulting in friction among their participants and in systemic problems with decoupling. Additionally, in those cases in which deliberation was constrained between and amongst participants, collaborative approaches have often failed to materialize. Our framework focuses on two key aspects of these breakdowns: assumptions about the orientation of MSI participants, and the deliberation processes that participants use to engage with each other to create these initiatives and sustain them over time. Drawing from stakeholder and deliberation theories, we revisit the concept of MSIs and show how their deliberative capacity may be enhanced in order to encourage participants to collaborate voluntarily.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBusiness Ethics Quarterly
Early online date7 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Deliberation
  • Stakeholder theory
  • Multi-stakeholder initiatives
  • Global supply chains
  • Sustainability
  • Collaboration

Cite this

@article{e689839b63f645c5ac4f70d08ec824c1,
title = "Can multi-stakeholder initiatives improve global supply chains? Improving deliberative capacity with a stakeholder orientation",
abstract = "Global multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are important instruments that have the potential to improve the social and environmental sustainability of global supply chains. However, they often fail to comprehensively address the needs and interests of various supplychain participants. While voluntary in nature, MSIs have most often been implemented through coercive approaches, resulting in friction among their participants and in systemic problems with decoupling. Additionally, in those cases in which deliberation was constrained between and amongst participants, collaborative approaches have often failed to materialize. Our framework focuses on two key aspects of these breakdowns: assumptions about the orientation of MSI participants, and the deliberation processes that participants use to engage with each other to create these initiatives and sustain them over time. Drawing from stakeholder and deliberation theories, we revisit the concept of MSIs and show how their deliberative capacity may be enhanced in order to encourage participants to collaborate voluntarily.",
keywords = "Deliberation, Stakeholder theory, Multi-stakeholder initiatives, Global supply chains, Sustainability, Collaboration",
author = "Vivek Soundararajan and Jill Brown and Wicks, {Andrew C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1017/beq.2018.38",
language = "English",
journal = "Business Ethics Quarterly",
issn = "1052-150X",
publisher = "Philosophy Documentation Center",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can multi-stakeholder initiatives improve global supply chains? Improving deliberative capacity with a stakeholder orientation

AU - Soundararajan, Vivek

AU - Brown, Jill

AU - Wicks, Andrew C.

PY - 2019/2/7

Y1 - 2019/2/7

N2 - Global multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are important instruments that have the potential to improve the social and environmental sustainability of global supply chains. However, they often fail to comprehensively address the needs and interests of various supplychain participants. While voluntary in nature, MSIs have most often been implemented through coercive approaches, resulting in friction among their participants and in systemic problems with decoupling. Additionally, in those cases in which deliberation was constrained between and amongst participants, collaborative approaches have often failed to materialize. Our framework focuses on two key aspects of these breakdowns: assumptions about the orientation of MSI participants, and the deliberation processes that participants use to engage with each other to create these initiatives and sustain them over time. Drawing from stakeholder and deliberation theories, we revisit the concept of MSIs and show how their deliberative capacity may be enhanced in order to encourage participants to collaborate voluntarily.

AB - Global multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are important instruments that have the potential to improve the social and environmental sustainability of global supply chains. However, they often fail to comprehensively address the needs and interests of various supplychain participants. While voluntary in nature, MSIs have most often been implemented through coercive approaches, resulting in friction among their participants and in systemic problems with decoupling. Additionally, in those cases in which deliberation was constrained between and amongst participants, collaborative approaches have often failed to materialize. Our framework focuses on two key aspects of these breakdowns: assumptions about the orientation of MSI participants, and the deliberation processes that participants use to engage with each other to create these initiatives and sustain them over time. Drawing from stakeholder and deliberation theories, we revisit the concept of MSIs and show how their deliberative capacity may be enhanced in order to encourage participants to collaborate voluntarily.

KW - Deliberation

KW - Stakeholder theory

KW - Multi-stakeholder initiatives

KW - Global supply chains

KW - Sustainability

KW - Collaboration

U2 - 10.1017/beq.2018.38

DO - 10.1017/beq.2018.38

M3 - Article

JO - Business Ethics Quarterly

JF - Business Ethics Quarterly

SN - 1052-150X

ER -