Can environmental improvement change the population distribution of walking?

on behalf of the iConnect consortium

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Few studies have explored the impact of environmental change on walking using controlled comparisons. Even fewer have examined whose behaviour changes and how. In a natural experimental study of new walking and cycling infrastructure, we explored changes in walking, identified groups who changed in similar ways and assessed whether exposure to the infrastructure was associated with trajectories of walking. Methods 1257 adults completed annual surveys assessing walking, sociodemographic and health characteristics and use of the infrastructure (2010-2012). Residential proximity to the new routes was assessed objectively. We used latent growth curve models to assess change in total walking, walking for recreation and for transport, used simple descriptive analysis and latent class analysis (LCA) to identify groups who changed in similar ways and examined factors associated with group membership using multinomial regression. Results LCA identified five trajectories, characterised by consistently low levels; consistently high levels; decreases; short-lived increases; and sustained increases. Those with lower levels of education and lower incomes were more likely to show both short-lived and sustained increases in walking for transport. However, those with lower levels of education were less likely to take up walking. Proximity to the intervention was associated with both uptake of and short-lived increases in walking for transport. Conclusions Environmental improvement encouraged the less active to take up walking for transport, as well as encouraging those who were already active to walk more. Further research should disentangle the role of socioeconomic characteristics in determining use of new environments and changes in walking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)528-535
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Volume71
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Can environmental improvement change the population distribution of walking? / on behalf of the iConnect consortium.

In: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol. 71, No. 6, 01.06.2017, p. 528-535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

on behalf of the iConnect consortium. / Can environmental improvement change the population distribution of walking?. In: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2017 ; Vol. 71, No. 6. pp. 528-535.
@article{fe255540d78b4553abb946c03f53b3f9,
title = "Can environmental improvement change the population distribution of walking?",
abstract = "Background Few studies have explored the impact of environmental change on walking using controlled comparisons. Even fewer have examined whose behaviour changes and how. In a natural experimental study of new walking and cycling infrastructure, we explored changes in walking, identified groups who changed in similar ways and assessed whether exposure to the infrastructure was associated with trajectories of walking. Methods 1257 adults completed annual surveys assessing walking, sociodemographic and health characteristics and use of the infrastructure (2010-2012). Residential proximity to the new routes was assessed objectively. We used latent growth curve models to assess change in total walking, walking for recreation and for transport, used simple descriptive analysis and latent class analysis (LCA) to identify groups who changed in similar ways and examined factors associated with group membership using multinomial regression. Results LCA identified five trajectories, characterised by consistently low levels; consistently high levels; decreases; short-lived increases; and sustained increases. Those with lower levels of education and lower incomes were more likely to show both short-lived and sustained increases in walking for transport. However, those with lower levels of education were less likely to take up walking. Proximity to the intervention was associated with both uptake of and short-lived increases in walking for transport. Conclusions Environmental improvement encouraged the less active to take up walking for transport, as well as encouraging those who were already active to walk more. Further research should disentangle the role of socioeconomic characteristics in determining use of new environments and changes in walking.",
author = "{on behalf of the iConnect consortium} and Jenna Panter and David Ogilvie and Christian Brand and Fiona Bull and Ashley Cooper and Andy Day and Nanette Mutrie and David Ogilvie and Jane Powell and John Preston and Harry Rutter",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/jech-2016-208417",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "528--535",
journal = "Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health",
issn = "1470-2738",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can environmental improvement change the population distribution of walking?

AU - on behalf of the iConnect consortium

AU - Panter, Jenna

AU - Ogilvie, David

AU - Brand, Christian

AU - Bull, Fiona

AU - Cooper, Ashley

AU - Day, Andy

AU - Mutrie, Nanette

AU - Ogilvie, David

AU - Powell, Jane

AU - Preston, John

AU - Rutter, Harry

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Background Few studies have explored the impact of environmental change on walking using controlled comparisons. Even fewer have examined whose behaviour changes and how. In a natural experimental study of new walking and cycling infrastructure, we explored changes in walking, identified groups who changed in similar ways and assessed whether exposure to the infrastructure was associated with trajectories of walking. Methods 1257 adults completed annual surveys assessing walking, sociodemographic and health characteristics and use of the infrastructure (2010-2012). Residential proximity to the new routes was assessed objectively. We used latent growth curve models to assess change in total walking, walking for recreation and for transport, used simple descriptive analysis and latent class analysis (LCA) to identify groups who changed in similar ways and examined factors associated with group membership using multinomial regression. Results LCA identified five trajectories, characterised by consistently low levels; consistently high levels; decreases; short-lived increases; and sustained increases. Those with lower levels of education and lower incomes were more likely to show both short-lived and sustained increases in walking for transport. However, those with lower levels of education were less likely to take up walking. Proximity to the intervention was associated with both uptake of and short-lived increases in walking for transport. Conclusions Environmental improvement encouraged the less active to take up walking for transport, as well as encouraging those who were already active to walk more. Further research should disentangle the role of socioeconomic characteristics in determining use of new environments and changes in walking.

AB - Background Few studies have explored the impact of environmental change on walking using controlled comparisons. Even fewer have examined whose behaviour changes and how. In a natural experimental study of new walking and cycling infrastructure, we explored changes in walking, identified groups who changed in similar ways and assessed whether exposure to the infrastructure was associated with trajectories of walking. Methods 1257 adults completed annual surveys assessing walking, sociodemographic and health characteristics and use of the infrastructure (2010-2012). Residential proximity to the new routes was assessed objectively. We used latent growth curve models to assess change in total walking, walking for recreation and for transport, used simple descriptive analysis and latent class analysis (LCA) to identify groups who changed in similar ways and examined factors associated with group membership using multinomial regression. Results LCA identified five trajectories, characterised by consistently low levels; consistently high levels; decreases; short-lived increases; and sustained increases. Those with lower levels of education and lower incomes were more likely to show both short-lived and sustained increases in walking for transport. However, those with lower levels of education were less likely to take up walking. Proximity to the intervention was associated with both uptake of and short-lived increases in walking for transport. Conclusions Environmental improvement encouraged the less active to take up walking for transport, as well as encouraging those who were already active to walk more. Further research should disentangle the role of socioeconomic characteristics in determining use of new environments and changes in walking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019251624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/jech-2016-208417

DO - 10.1136/jech-2016-208417

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 528

EP - 535

JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

SN - 1470-2738

IS - 6

ER -