Bringing institutionalisation to the fore in educational organisational theory: Analysing International Schools as institutions

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

85 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, we use institutionalisation theory to analyse the legitimacy of schools identifying themselves or being identified by others as ‘international’; identify aspects of institutionalisation theory that could be developed; and argue that an institutionalisation perspective should be more central in educational organisation theory. International schools are an appropriate form of educational organisation to analyse from an institutional perspective. The rapid growth of different types of International Schools with new rationales raises concerns about their legitimacy relative to traditional norms. In applying institutionalisation theory to International Schools, a number of relevant issues arise: the significance of the institution’s primary task and institutional work on it; the centrality of affect in schools as institutions; and the very different ontological bases for the three pillars of institutionalisation; the significance of the ‘student dimension’ in institutionalisation, the nature of the members of the institution, their dominant mode of interpretation, their motivations and their personality; and the role of teachers’ professionalism in legitimising schools. We argue that those responsible for establishing the legitimacy of their schools, will be least challenged by ensuring compliance with the regulative pillar, and most challenged by ensuring conformance to the cultural-cognitive pillar.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventAamerican Educational Research Association Annual Meeting - US, Washington, USA United States
Duration: 8 Apr 201612 Apr 2016

Conference

ConferenceAamerican Educational Research Association Annual Meeting
CountryUSA United States
CityWashington
Period8/04/1612/04/16

Fingerprint

institutionalization
school
legitimacy
organization theory
educational theory
personality
interpretation
teacher
student

Keywords

  • Institutions
  • Institutionalisation
  • Institutional theory
  • Institutional work
  • Institutional legitimacy

Cite this

Bunnell, T., Fertig, M., & James, C. (2016). Bringing institutionalisation to the fore in educational organisational theory: Analysing International Schools as institutions. Paper presented at Aamerican Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, USA United States.

Bringing institutionalisation to the fore in educational organisational theory: Analysing International Schools as institutions. / Bunnell, Tristan; Fertig, Michael; James, Chris.

2016. Paper presented at Aamerican Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, USA United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Bunnell, T, Fertig, M & James, C 2016, 'Bringing institutionalisation to the fore in educational organisational theory: Analysing International Schools as institutions' Paper presented at Aamerican Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, USA United States, 8/04/16 - 12/04/16, .
Bunnell T, Fertig M, James C. Bringing institutionalisation to the fore in educational organisational theory: Analysing International Schools as institutions. 2016. Paper presented at Aamerican Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, USA United States.
Bunnell, Tristan ; Fertig, Michael ; James, Chris. / Bringing institutionalisation to the fore in educational organisational theory: Analysing International Schools as institutions. Paper presented at Aamerican Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, USA United States.17 p.
@conference{8bf812ab4b284dd1a15f081bf605823c,
title = "Bringing institutionalisation to the fore in educational organisational theory: Analysing International Schools as institutions",
abstract = "In this paper, we use institutionalisation theory to analyse the legitimacy of schools identifying themselves or being identified by others as ‘international’; identify aspects of institutionalisation theory that could be developed; and argue that an institutionalisation perspective should be more central in educational organisation theory. International schools are an appropriate form of educational organisation to analyse from an institutional perspective. The rapid growth of different types of International Schools with new rationales raises concerns about their legitimacy relative to traditional norms. In applying institutionalisation theory to International Schools, a number of relevant issues arise: the significance of the institution’s primary task and institutional work on it; the centrality of affect in schools as institutions; and the very different ontological bases for the three pillars of institutionalisation; the significance of the ‘student dimension’ in institutionalisation, the nature of the members of the institution, their dominant mode of interpretation, their motivations and their personality; and the role of teachers’ professionalism in legitimising schools. We argue that those responsible for establishing the legitimacy of their schools, will be least challenged by ensuring compliance with the regulative pillar, and most challenged by ensuring conformance to the cultural-cognitive pillar.",
keywords = "Institutions, Institutionalisation, Institutional theory, Institutional work, Institutional legitimacy",
author = "Tristan Bunnell and Michael Fertig and Chris James",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
note = "Aamerican Educational Research Association Annual Meeting ; Conference date: 08-04-2016 Through 12-04-2016",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Bringing institutionalisation to the fore in educational organisational theory: Analysing International Schools as institutions

AU - Bunnell, Tristan

AU - Fertig, Michael

AU - James, Chris

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In this paper, we use institutionalisation theory to analyse the legitimacy of schools identifying themselves or being identified by others as ‘international’; identify aspects of institutionalisation theory that could be developed; and argue that an institutionalisation perspective should be more central in educational organisation theory. International schools are an appropriate form of educational organisation to analyse from an institutional perspective. The rapid growth of different types of International Schools with new rationales raises concerns about their legitimacy relative to traditional norms. In applying institutionalisation theory to International Schools, a number of relevant issues arise: the significance of the institution’s primary task and institutional work on it; the centrality of affect in schools as institutions; and the very different ontological bases for the three pillars of institutionalisation; the significance of the ‘student dimension’ in institutionalisation, the nature of the members of the institution, their dominant mode of interpretation, their motivations and their personality; and the role of teachers’ professionalism in legitimising schools. We argue that those responsible for establishing the legitimacy of their schools, will be least challenged by ensuring compliance with the regulative pillar, and most challenged by ensuring conformance to the cultural-cognitive pillar.

AB - In this paper, we use institutionalisation theory to analyse the legitimacy of schools identifying themselves or being identified by others as ‘international’; identify aspects of institutionalisation theory that could be developed; and argue that an institutionalisation perspective should be more central in educational organisation theory. International schools are an appropriate form of educational organisation to analyse from an institutional perspective. The rapid growth of different types of International Schools with new rationales raises concerns about their legitimacy relative to traditional norms. In applying institutionalisation theory to International Schools, a number of relevant issues arise: the significance of the institution’s primary task and institutional work on it; the centrality of affect in schools as institutions; and the very different ontological bases for the three pillars of institutionalisation; the significance of the ‘student dimension’ in institutionalisation, the nature of the members of the institution, their dominant mode of interpretation, their motivations and their personality; and the role of teachers’ professionalism in legitimising schools. We argue that those responsible for establishing the legitimacy of their schools, will be least challenged by ensuring compliance with the regulative pillar, and most challenged by ensuring conformance to the cultural-cognitive pillar.

KW - Institutions

KW - Institutionalisation

KW - Institutional theory

KW - Institutional work

KW - Institutional legitimacy

M3 - Paper

ER -