Abstract
This paper presents a microanalysis of the media representation of victimhood in key public narratives. It builds on Peelo's account of the 'mediated witness' as part of the struggle for control of the crime agenda. To extend Peelo's analysis to other areas of public policy making, the paper uses the example of an iconic welfare 'scandal' (the Maria Colwell case) and focuses particularly on the role of victims themselves in the struggle to own and exploit victimhood. The paper argues that ambiguity in the ascription of victimhood can reveal points of unresolved tension in the emerging public narrative that the scandal (or crime) is meant to signify, explain and incorporate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 367-385 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Crime Media Culture |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- emotionality
- scandal
- child abuse
- mediated witness
- victimhood
- welfare policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Booing or cheering? Ambiguity in the construction of victimhood in the case of Maria Colwell'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS