Block, amend, delay: tobacco industry efforts to influence the European Union’s Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC)

Sema Mandal, Anna Gilmore, Jeff Collin, Heide Weishaar, Katherine Smith, Martin McKee

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

Abstract

In 1996, discussion began in Brussels on the need for further tobacco control measures. Following extensive consultation, in November 1999 the European Commission proposed a new Tobacco Products Directive (TPD). The proposal would strengthen existing European legislation on cigarette yields and product labelling by lowering limits for tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yields and by
enlarging warning labels. It also sought to introduce stringent ingredients disclosure provisions and a ban on misleading descriptors such as “light” and “mild”, and aimed to prohibit the export of noncompliant products outside the European Union (EU). The tobacco industry mounted an intense lobbying campaign in response and made at least five legal challenges against the directive. Despite such efforts the directive was enacted successfully in 2001. This study seeks to identify and analyse tobacco sector responses to the directive and discuss the implications for future legislation within the EU and beyond. Such an analysis is particularly timely given the current review of the directive and
emerging debates around plain packaging.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationBrussels
PublisherSmokefree Partnership/Cancer Research UK
Number of pages99
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

European Community
nicotine
industry
legislation
ban
European Commission
campaign

Cite this

Mandal, S., Gilmore, A., Collin, J., Weishaar, H., Smith, K., & McKee, M. (2009). Block, amend, delay: tobacco industry efforts to influence the European Union’s Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC). Brussels: Smokefree Partnership/Cancer Research UK.

Block, amend, delay: tobacco industry efforts to influence the European Union’s Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC). / Mandal, Sema; Gilmore, Anna; Collin, Jeff; Weishaar, Heide; Smith, Katherine; McKee, Martin.

Brussels : Smokefree Partnership/Cancer Research UK, 2009. 99 p.

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

Mandal, S, Gilmore, A, Collin, J, Weishaar, H, Smith, K & McKee, M 2009, Block, amend, delay: tobacco industry efforts to influence the European Union’s Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC). Smokefree Partnership/Cancer Research UK, Brussels.
Mandal S, Gilmore A, Collin J, Weishaar H, Smith K, McKee M. Block, amend, delay: tobacco industry efforts to influence the European Union’s Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC). Brussels: Smokefree Partnership/Cancer Research UK, 2009. 99 p.
Mandal, Sema ; Gilmore, Anna ; Collin, Jeff ; Weishaar, Heide ; Smith, Katherine ; McKee, Martin. / Block, amend, delay: tobacco industry efforts to influence the European Union’s Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC). Brussels : Smokefree Partnership/Cancer Research UK, 2009. 99 p.
@book{ad000c3bcdd043a4afc585a1eb123261,
title = "Block, amend, delay: tobacco industry efforts to influence the European Union’s Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC)",
abstract = "In 1996, discussion began in Brussels on the need for further tobacco control measures. Following extensive consultation, in November 1999 the European Commission proposed a new Tobacco Products Directive (TPD). The proposal would strengthen existing European legislation on cigarette yields and product labelling by lowering limits for tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yields and byenlarging warning labels. It also sought to introduce stringent ingredients disclosure provisions and a ban on misleading descriptors such as “light” and “mild”, and aimed to prohibit the export of noncompliant products outside the European Union (EU). The tobacco industry mounted an intense lobbying campaign in response and made at least five legal challenges against the directive. Despite such efforts the directive was enacted successfully in 2001. This study seeks to identify and analyse tobacco sector responses to the directive and discuss the implications for future legislation within the EU and beyond. Such an analysis is particularly timely given the current review of the directive andemerging debates around plain packaging.",
author = "Sema Mandal and Anna Gilmore and Jeff Collin and Heide Weishaar and Katherine Smith and Martin McKee",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
language = "English",
publisher = "Smokefree Partnership/Cancer Research UK",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Block, amend, delay: tobacco industry efforts to influence the European Union’s Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC)

AU - Mandal, Sema

AU - Gilmore, Anna

AU - Collin, Jeff

AU - Weishaar, Heide

AU - Smith, Katherine

AU - McKee, Martin

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - In 1996, discussion began in Brussels on the need for further tobacco control measures. Following extensive consultation, in November 1999 the European Commission proposed a new Tobacco Products Directive (TPD). The proposal would strengthen existing European legislation on cigarette yields and product labelling by lowering limits for tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yields and byenlarging warning labels. It also sought to introduce stringent ingredients disclosure provisions and a ban on misleading descriptors such as “light” and “mild”, and aimed to prohibit the export of noncompliant products outside the European Union (EU). The tobacco industry mounted an intense lobbying campaign in response and made at least five legal challenges against the directive. Despite such efforts the directive was enacted successfully in 2001. This study seeks to identify and analyse tobacco sector responses to the directive and discuss the implications for future legislation within the EU and beyond. Such an analysis is particularly timely given the current review of the directive andemerging debates around plain packaging.

AB - In 1996, discussion began in Brussels on the need for further tobacco control measures. Following extensive consultation, in November 1999 the European Commission proposed a new Tobacco Products Directive (TPD). The proposal would strengthen existing European legislation on cigarette yields and product labelling by lowering limits for tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yields and byenlarging warning labels. It also sought to introduce stringent ingredients disclosure provisions and a ban on misleading descriptors such as “light” and “mild”, and aimed to prohibit the export of noncompliant products outside the European Union (EU). The tobacco industry mounted an intense lobbying campaign in response and made at least five legal challenges against the directive. Despite such efforts the directive was enacted successfully in 2001. This study seeks to identify and analyse tobacco sector responses to the directive and discuss the implications for future legislation within the EU and beyond. Such an analysis is particularly timely given the current review of the directive andemerging debates around plain packaging.

UR - http://www.smokefreepartnership.eu/images/Reports-and-Position-Papers/EU_TI_TPD_report_May_2012.pdf

M3 - Other report

BT - Block, amend, delay: tobacco industry efforts to influence the European Union’s Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC)

PB - Smokefree Partnership/Cancer Research UK

CY - Brussels

ER -