Abstract
The provision of the extraordinarily deadly product of cigarettes is dominated by a small number of large and incredibly profitable shareholder owned companies that are focussed on cigarettes. The legal duty of their managers to maximise shareholder wealth means that such companies vigorously fight any new public health measures that have the potential to disrupt their massive profit making, and have the resources to do so. Protecting the public health is therefore made a lot more difficult and expensive. We suggest that one way to counter this would be to actively design future tobacco control policies so that tobacco companies face mechanisms and incentives to develop in such a way that they no longer achieve the greatest shareholder value by focusing on cigarettes. A proper tobacco diversification and exit strategy for the shareholders of the profit-seeking tobacco industry would protect the public health by addressing the current addiction to the continuation of the cigarette market. The increasing popularity of e-cigarettes presents a particular opportunity in this regard, and we therefore suggest a possible policy response in order to start discussion in this area.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 14-18 |
Journal | International Journal of Drug Policy |
Volume | 29 |
Early online date | 29 Dec 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2016 |
Keywords
- Sustainability
- E-cigarettes
- Incentives
- Regulation
- Industry Structure
- Tobacco Endgame
- Tobacco Industry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Big tobacco, e-cigarettes, and a road to the smoking endgame'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Rob Branston
- Management - Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor)
- Centre for Governance, Regulation and Industrial Strategy
- Marketing, Business & Society
- Centre for Business, Organisations and Society (CBOS)
- Tobacco Control Research Group (TCRG)
- Centre for 21st Century Public Health
Person: Research & Teaching, Core staff