Projects per year
Abstract
Methods: A combination of inductive and deductive thematic coding of internal industry documents, academic literature, and interviews with key informants from international organisations and global civil society was used to identify action-based strategies ultra- processed food industry actors employ to influence global-level policy.
Results: Ultra-processed food industry actors have attempted to influence the WHO and its policies through three main action-based strategies: coalition management, involvement in policy formulation, and information management. Coalition management includes the creation and use of overt alliances between corporations—business associations—and more covert science- and policy-focused intermediaries, the hiring of former WHO staff, and attempted co- option of civil society organisations. Industry involvement in policy formulation is operationalised largely through the lobbying of Member States to support industry positions and business associations gaining access to WHO through formal consultations and hearings. Information management involves funding and disseminating research favour able to commercial interests, and challenging unfavourable evidence.
Conclusion: We provide novel insights into how ultra-processed food industry actors shape global-level NCD policy and identify a clear need to guard against commercial interference at global and national level to advance NCD policy. In their approach, the political behaviour of multinational food corporations bears similarities to that of the tobacco industry. Increased awareness of, and safeguarding against, commercial interference at the national as well as the global level have the potential to strengthen the crucial work of the WHO.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e005216 |
Journal | BMJ Global Health |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | 11 Jun 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 11 Jun 2021 |
Funding
Our analysis indicates that the UPFI has consistently attempted to form a closer relationship with civil society in the global NCD space. A number of global NGOs have received funding from the UPFI (CS-1, CS-2, CS-9): the World Heart Federation, for instance, has historically received funds from Unilever74 and the International Diabetes Federation from Nestlé.86 87 Civil society interviewees reported that UPFI offers of financial support, as well as invites to attend and present at industry-organised events or join industry panels, were common (ex-IO-1, CS-1). One senior advocate recalled: Funding KL is funded by the Roger and Sue Whorrod PhD Studentship. ABG and HR received funding from SPECTRUM for this work, a UK Prevention Research Partnership (UKPRP, https://ukprp.org) Consortium. UKPRP is an initiative funded by the UK Research and Innovation Councils, the Department of Health and Social Care and the UK devolved administrations and leading health research charities. Disclaimer The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Big Food and the World Health Organization: A qualitative study of corporate political activity in global-level non-communicable disease policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished