Bicycling campaigns promoting health versus campaigns promoting safety: A randomized controlled online study of ‘dangerization’

Tim Gamble, Ian Walker, Aleksandra Laketa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 4 Citations

Abstract

This study tested the idea that promoting bicycle safety might inadvertently discourage bicycling by having negative effects on how the activity is perceived. It also tested the contrary idea that stressing the health benefits of bicycling would have a positive effect on perceptions and intentions to cycle. Two-hundred and twenty-eight adults were randomly allocated to read safety-focused, health-focused, or control publicity materials and their immediate influences on bicycling perceptions were measured. Health-focused materials significantly increased bicycling’s perceived health benefits amongst non-bicyclists and had no influence on perceived risk; the safety-focused campaign had no effect on either perceived risks or health benefits. Neither campaign measurably changed intentions to bicycle nor the perceived enjoyment of bicycling, both of which were clearly higher amongst bicyclists than non-bicyclists. The study suggests that, whilst safety-focused campaigns are unlikely to have an immediate negative effect on people’s perceptions and intentions to cycle, nor do they offer anything positive to this group; health-focused campaigns, on the other hand, make bicycling appear more beneficial to those who do not currently do it. In addition, although the possibility exists that current bicyclists are a qualitatively different sub-population, able to enjoy bicycling in non-conducive environments, their rating bicycling as more enjoyable than non-bicyclists suggests new campaigns might usefully emphasize the enjoyment of bicycling to encourage its uptake.
LanguageEnglish
Pages369-378
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Transport and Health
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatusPublished - Sep 2015

Fingerprint

Bicycling
Health Promotion
campaign
Health
Safety
health
Bicycles
bicycle
Insurance Benefits
publicity
rating

Keywords

  • bicycling
  • cycling
  • risk perception
  • enjoyment
  • health benefits
  • public health campaigns

Cite this

Bicycling campaigns promoting health versus campaigns promoting safety : A randomized controlled online study of ‘dangerization’. / Gamble, Tim; Walker, Ian; Laketa, Aleksandra.

In: Journal of Transport and Health, Vol. 2, No. 3, 09.2015, p. 369-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{468bc5e4d2e64559934c56e5adbf9469,
title = "Bicycling campaigns promoting health versus campaigns promoting safety: A randomized controlled online study of ‘dangerization’",
abstract = "This study tested the idea that promoting bicycle safety might inadvertently discourage bicycling by having negative effects on how the activity is perceived. It also tested the contrary idea that stressing the health benefits of bicycling would have a positive effect on perceptions and intentions to cycle. Two-hundred and twenty-eight adults were randomly allocated to read safety-focused, health-focused, or control publicity materials and their immediate influences on bicycling perceptions were measured. Health-focused materials significantly increased bicycling’s perceived health benefits amongst non-bicyclists and had no influence on perceived risk; the safety-focused campaign had no effect on either perceived risks or health benefits. Neither campaign measurably changed intentions to bicycle nor the perceived enjoyment of bicycling, both of which were clearly higher amongst bicyclists than non-bicyclists. The study suggests that, whilst safety-focused campaigns are unlikely to have an immediate negative effect on people’s perceptions and intentions to cycle, nor do they offer anything positive to this group; health-focused campaigns, on the other hand, make bicycling appear more beneficial to those who do not currently do it. In addition, although the possibility exists that current bicyclists are a qualitatively different sub-population, able to enjoy bicycling in non-conducive environments, their rating bicycling as more enjoyable than non-bicyclists suggests new campaigns might usefully emphasize the enjoyment of bicycling to encourage its uptake.",
keywords = "bicycling, cycling, risk perception, enjoyment, health benefits, public health campaigns",
author = "Tim Gamble and Ian Walker and Aleksandra Laketa",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jth.2015.05.007",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "369--378",
journal = "Journal of Transport and Health",
issn = "2214-1413",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bicycling campaigns promoting health versus campaigns promoting safety

T2 - Journal of Transport and Health

AU - Gamble,Tim

AU - Walker,Ian

AU - Laketa,Aleksandra

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - This study tested the idea that promoting bicycle safety might inadvertently discourage bicycling by having negative effects on how the activity is perceived. It also tested the contrary idea that stressing the health benefits of bicycling would have a positive effect on perceptions and intentions to cycle. Two-hundred and twenty-eight adults were randomly allocated to read safety-focused, health-focused, or control publicity materials and their immediate influences on bicycling perceptions were measured. Health-focused materials significantly increased bicycling’s perceived health benefits amongst non-bicyclists and had no influence on perceived risk; the safety-focused campaign had no effect on either perceived risks or health benefits. Neither campaign measurably changed intentions to bicycle nor the perceived enjoyment of bicycling, both of which were clearly higher amongst bicyclists than non-bicyclists. The study suggests that, whilst safety-focused campaigns are unlikely to have an immediate negative effect on people’s perceptions and intentions to cycle, nor do they offer anything positive to this group; health-focused campaigns, on the other hand, make bicycling appear more beneficial to those who do not currently do it. In addition, although the possibility exists that current bicyclists are a qualitatively different sub-population, able to enjoy bicycling in non-conducive environments, their rating bicycling as more enjoyable than non-bicyclists suggests new campaigns might usefully emphasize the enjoyment of bicycling to encourage its uptake.

AB - This study tested the idea that promoting bicycle safety might inadvertently discourage bicycling by having negative effects on how the activity is perceived. It also tested the contrary idea that stressing the health benefits of bicycling would have a positive effect on perceptions and intentions to cycle. Two-hundred and twenty-eight adults were randomly allocated to read safety-focused, health-focused, or control publicity materials and their immediate influences on bicycling perceptions were measured. Health-focused materials significantly increased bicycling’s perceived health benefits amongst non-bicyclists and had no influence on perceived risk; the safety-focused campaign had no effect on either perceived risks or health benefits. Neither campaign measurably changed intentions to bicycle nor the perceived enjoyment of bicycling, both of which were clearly higher amongst bicyclists than non-bicyclists. The study suggests that, whilst safety-focused campaigns are unlikely to have an immediate negative effect on people’s perceptions and intentions to cycle, nor do they offer anything positive to this group; health-focused campaigns, on the other hand, make bicycling appear more beneficial to those who do not currently do it. In addition, although the possibility exists that current bicyclists are a qualitatively different sub-population, able to enjoy bicycling in non-conducive environments, their rating bicycling as more enjoyable than non-bicyclists suggests new campaigns might usefully emphasize the enjoyment of bicycling to encourage its uptake.

KW - bicycling

KW - cycling

KW - risk perception

KW - enjoyment

KW - health benefits

KW - public health campaigns

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2015.05.007

U2 - 10.1016/j.jth.2015.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jth.2015.05.007

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 369

EP - 378

JO - Journal of Transport and Health

JF - Journal of Transport and Health

SN - 2214-1413

IS - 3

ER -