Biased interpretations of ambiguous bodily threat information in adolescents with chronic pain

L. C. Heathcote, K. Jacobs, C. Eccleston, E. Fox, J. Y. F. Lau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)
104 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Adult patients with chronic pain are consistently shown to interpret ambiguous health and bodily information in a pain-related and threatening way. This interpretation bias may play a role in the development and maintenance of pain and disability. However, no studies have yet investigated the role of interpretation bias in adolescent patients with pain, despite that pain often first becomes chronic in youth. We administered the Adolescent Interpretations of Bodily Threat (AIBT) task to adolescents with chronic pain (N 5 66) and adolescents without chronic pain (N574). Adolescents were 10 to 18 years old and completed the study procedures either at the clinic (patient group) or at school (control group). We found that adolescents with chronic pain were less likely to endorse benign interpretations of ambiguous pain and bodily threat information than adolescents without chronic pain, particularly when reporting on the strength of belief in those interpretations being true. These differences between patients and controls were not evident for ambiguous social situations, and they could not be explained by differences in anxious or depressive symptoms. Furthermore, this interpretation pattern was associated with increased levels of disability among adolescent patients, even after controlling for severity of chronic pain and pain catastrophizing. The current findings extend our understanding of the role and nature of cognition in adolescent pain, and provide justification for using the AIBT task in longitudinal and training studies to further investigate causal associations between interpretation bias and chronic pain.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-478
Number of pages8
JournalPain
Volume158
Issue number3
Early online date6 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Chronic Pain
Pain
Catastrophization
Cognition
Longitudinal Studies
Maintenance
Depression
Control Groups
Health

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Ambiguous situations
  • Chronic pain
  • Cognitive bias
  • Interpretation bias

Cite this

Biased interpretations of ambiguous bodily threat information in adolescents with chronic pain. / Heathcote, L. C.; Jacobs, K.; Eccleston, C.; Fox, E.; Lau, J. Y. F.

In: Pain, Vol. 158, No. 3, 03.2017, p. 471-478.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heathcote, L. C. ; Jacobs, K. ; Eccleston, C. ; Fox, E. ; Lau, J. Y. F. / Biased interpretations of ambiguous bodily threat information in adolescents with chronic pain. In: Pain. 2017 ; Vol. 158, No. 3. pp. 471-478.
@article{4138c00aad59486582b66c442496ae8f,
title = "Biased interpretations of ambiguous bodily threat information in adolescents with chronic pain",
abstract = "Adult patients with chronic pain are consistently shown to interpret ambiguous health and bodily information in a pain-related and threatening way. This interpretation bias may play a role in the development and maintenance of pain and disability. However, no studies have yet investigated the role of interpretation bias in adolescent patients with pain, despite that pain often first becomes chronic in youth. We administered the Adolescent Interpretations of Bodily Threat (AIBT) task to adolescents with chronic pain (N 5 66) and adolescents without chronic pain (N574). Adolescents were 10 to 18 years old and completed the study procedures either at the clinic (patient group) or at school (control group). We found that adolescents with chronic pain were less likely to endorse benign interpretations of ambiguous pain and bodily threat information than adolescents without chronic pain, particularly when reporting on the strength of belief in those interpretations being true. These differences between patients and controls were not evident for ambiguous social situations, and they could not be explained by differences in anxious or depressive symptoms. Furthermore, this interpretation pattern was associated with increased levels of disability among adolescent patients, even after controlling for severity of chronic pain and pain catastrophizing. The current findings extend our understanding of the role and nature of cognition in adolescent pain, and provide justification for using the AIBT task in longitudinal and training studies to further investigate causal associations between interpretation bias and chronic pain.",
keywords = "Adolescents, Ambiguous situations, Chronic pain, Cognitive bias, Interpretation bias",
author = "Heathcote, {L. C.} and K. Jacobs and C. Eccleston and E. Fox and Lau, {J. Y. F.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000781",
language = "English",
volume = "158",
pages = "471--478",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biased interpretations of ambiguous bodily threat information in adolescents with chronic pain

AU - Heathcote, L. C.

AU - Jacobs, K.

AU - Eccleston, C.

AU - Fox, E.

AU - Lau, J. Y. F.

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - Adult patients with chronic pain are consistently shown to interpret ambiguous health and bodily information in a pain-related and threatening way. This interpretation bias may play a role in the development and maintenance of pain and disability. However, no studies have yet investigated the role of interpretation bias in adolescent patients with pain, despite that pain often first becomes chronic in youth. We administered the Adolescent Interpretations of Bodily Threat (AIBT) task to adolescents with chronic pain (N 5 66) and adolescents without chronic pain (N574). Adolescents were 10 to 18 years old and completed the study procedures either at the clinic (patient group) or at school (control group). We found that adolescents with chronic pain were less likely to endorse benign interpretations of ambiguous pain and bodily threat information than adolescents without chronic pain, particularly when reporting on the strength of belief in those interpretations being true. These differences between patients and controls were not evident for ambiguous social situations, and they could not be explained by differences in anxious or depressive symptoms. Furthermore, this interpretation pattern was associated with increased levels of disability among adolescent patients, even after controlling for severity of chronic pain and pain catastrophizing. The current findings extend our understanding of the role and nature of cognition in adolescent pain, and provide justification for using the AIBT task in longitudinal and training studies to further investigate causal associations between interpretation bias and chronic pain.

AB - Adult patients with chronic pain are consistently shown to interpret ambiguous health and bodily information in a pain-related and threatening way. This interpretation bias may play a role in the development and maintenance of pain and disability. However, no studies have yet investigated the role of interpretation bias in adolescent patients with pain, despite that pain often first becomes chronic in youth. We administered the Adolescent Interpretations of Bodily Threat (AIBT) task to adolescents with chronic pain (N 5 66) and adolescents without chronic pain (N574). Adolescents were 10 to 18 years old and completed the study procedures either at the clinic (patient group) or at school (control group). We found that adolescents with chronic pain were less likely to endorse benign interpretations of ambiguous pain and bodily threat information than adolescents without chronic pain, particularly when reporting on the strength of belief in those interpretations being true. These differences between patients and controls were not evident for ambiguous social situations, and they could not be explained by differences in anxious or depressive symptoms. Furthermore, this interpretation pattern was associated with increased levels of disability among adolescent patients, even after controlling for severity of chronic pain and pain catastrophizing. The current findings extend our understanding of the role and nature of cognition in adolescent pain, and provide justification for using the AIBT task in longitudinal and training studies to further investigate causal associations between interpretation bias and chronic pain.

KW - Adolescents

KW - Ambiguous situations

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Cognitive bias

KW - Interpretation bias

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000781

U2 - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000781

DO - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000781

M3 - Article

VL - 158

SP - 471

EP - 478

JO - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 3

ER -