Beyond welfare chauvinism and deservingness: Rationales of belonging as a conceptual framework for the politics and governance of migrants’ rights

Emma Carmel, Bozena Sojka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


This article argues that the politics and governance of migrants’ rights needs to be reframed. In particular, the terms “welfare chauvinism”, and deservingness should be replaced. Using a qualitative transnational case study of policymakers in Poland and the UK, we develop an alternative approach. In fine-grained and small-scale interpretive analysis, we tease out four distinct rationales of belonging that mark out the terms and practices of social membership, as well as relative positions of privilege and subordination. These rationales of belonging are: temporal-territorial, ethno-cultural, labourist, and welfareist. Importantly, these rationales are knitted together by different framings of the transnational contexts, within which the politics and governance of migration and social protection are given meaning. The rationales of belonging do not exist in isolation, but in each country, they qualify each other in ways that imply different politics and governance of migrants’ rights. Taken together, these rationales of belonging generate justifications for migrant inclusion that are stratified by class, gender and ethnicity as well as transnational projects of social exclusion.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Social Policy
Publication statusAcceptance date - 13 May 2020


  • welfare chauvinism,
  • migrant rights,
  • deservingness,
  • migration,
  • EU free movement,
  • governance,
  • UK,
  • Poland

Cite this