This article argues that the politics and governance of migrants’ rights needs to be reframed. In particular, the terms “welfare chauvinism”, and deservingness should be replaced. Using a qualitative transnational case study of policymakers in Poland and the UK, we develop an alternative approach. In fine-grained and small-scale interpretive analysis, we tease out four distinct rationales of belonging that mark out the terms and practices of social membership, as well as relative positions of privilege and subordination. These rationales of belonging are: temporal-territorial, ethno-cultural, labourist, and welfareist. Importantly, these rationales are knitted together by different framings of the transnational contexts, within which the politics and governance of migration and social protection are given meaning. The rationales of belonging do not exist in isolation, but in each country, they qualify each other in ways that imply different politics and governance of migrants’ rights. Taken together, these rationales of belonging generate justifications for migrant inclusion that are stratified by class, gender and ethnicity as well as transnational projects of social exclusion.
- welfare chauvinism,
- migrant rights,
- EU free movement,
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Beyond welfare chauvinism and deservingness. Rationales of belonging as a conceptual framework for the politics and governance of migrants’ rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- Department of Social & Policy Sciences - Senior Lecturer
- Centre for Analysis of Social Policy (CASP)
- Institute for Policy Research (IPR)
- Centre for Governance, Regulation and Industrial Strategy
- UKRI CDT in Accountable, Responsible and Transparent AI
Person: Research & Teaching