Beyond the Coaches Eye: Understanding the ‘How’ and 'Why’ of Maturity Selection Biases in Male Academy Soccer

Megan Hill, Thomas John, Darragh McGee, Sean Cumming

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

This study explored academy football coaches’ perceptions and experiences of managing individual differences in the maturity timing of male adolescent football players in an English Premier League academy. Using a longitudinal mixed method design, 98 under 12-16 players were assessed for maturity status, growth velocities, and match performance grade. Interviews with nine respective coaches were conducted in parallel. The qualitative and quantitative data were combined to generate a contextualised richer understanding and four archetypal case studies. Findings showed coaches perceive various advantages and disadvantages to players maturing either ahead or in delay of their peers and had different expectations of performance based upon a players maturity status; biological maturity status and timing had large implications for selection and release decisions. This study highlights the challenges of developing, managing and selecting adolescent players in elite male youth football. Biological maturation confounds talent identification and development, and academy environments need to monitor maturity status and educate coaches and selectors on the complexities and intricacies of individual differences in maturity timing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1913-1928
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Volume18
Issue number6
Early online date7 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: Megan Hill was a funded PhD student of the football club. Thomas John was an employee of the football club.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond the Coaches Eye: Understanding the ‘How’ and 'Why’ of Maturity Selection Biases in Male Academy Soccer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this