Abstract
Psychologists typically rely on self-report data when quantifying mobile phone usage, despite little evidence of its validity. In this paper we explore the accuracy of using self-reported estimates when compared with actual smartphone use. We also include source code to process and visualise these data. We compared 23 participants' actual smartphone use over a two-week period with self-reported estimates and the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale. Our results indicate that estimated time spent using a smartphone may be an adequate measure of use, unless a greater resolution of data are required. Estimates concerning the number of times an individual used their phone across a typical day did not correlate with actual smartphone use. Neither estimated duration nor number of uses correlated with the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale. We conclude that estimated smartphone use should be interpreted with caution in psychological research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e0139004 |
Journal | PLoS ONE |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 28 Oct 2015 |
Bibliographical note
© 2015 Andrews et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are creditedKeywords
- smartphones
- time perception
- habit formation
- checking behaviours
- ambulatory assessment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond self report: tools to compare estimated and real-world smartphone use'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Lukasz Piwek
- Management - Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor)
- Information, Decisions & Operations
- Centre for Healthcare Innovation and Improvement
- Applied Digital Behaviour Lab
- EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Cyber Security
- Centre for Future of Work
- Institute for Digital Security and Behaviour (IDSB)
Person: Research & Teaching, Core staff