Beyond information seeking

Consumers' online deliberation about the risks and benefits of red meat

P. Rutsaert, J. Barnett, R. Gaspar, A. Marcu, Z. Pieniak, B. Seibt, M.L. Lima, D. Fletcher, W. Verbeke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)
73 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Successfully engaging consumers in a dialogue may provide opportunities for better tailored and more effective communication about food-related risks and benefits. Using an online deliberation concept and software, VIZZATA™, we explored the validity of a behavioral measure of deliberation in an online environment in the context of consumers' perceptions and information seeking about the risks and benefits of red meat. Participants from Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom (n= 150) were given the opportunity to engage in an asynchronous interaction with the research team about the information provided. Online deliberation was operationalized as an individual metric based on the number of questions asked in relation to the information, the number of comments left, the number of glossary terms accessed, and the time spent on deliberative activity. This operationalization provided a coherent measure of deliberation which was positively correlated with information recall about the risks and benefits of red meat. Participants who perceived the information about red meat risks and benefits as too complex engaged less with the information. The study herewith presents a novel method of investigating consumers' deliberation about food issues that conceptualizes consumer engagement as more than just information seeking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-201
Number of pages11
JournalFood Quality and Preference
Volume39
Early online date18 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

Fingerprint

red meat
Food
Portugal
Belgium
consumer information
consumer attitudes
Software
communication (human)
United Kingdom
Red Meat
Research

Cite this

Beyond information seeking : Consumers' online deliberation about the risks and benefits of red meat. / Rutsaert, P.; Barnett, J.; Gaspar, R.; Marcu, A.; Pieniak, Z.; Seibt, B.; Lima, M.L.; Fletcher, D.; Verbeke, W.

In: Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 39, 01.2015, p. 191-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rutsaert, P, Barnett, J, Gaspar, R, Marcu, A, Pieniak, Z, Seibt, B, Lima, ML, Fletcher, D & Verbeke, W 2015, 'Beyond information seeking: Consumers' online deliberation about the risks and benefits of red meat', Food Quality and Preference, vol. 39, pp. 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.011
Rutsaert, P. ; Barnett, J. ; Gaspar, R. ; Marcu, A. ; Pieniak, Z. ; Seibt, B. ; Lima, M.L. ; Fletcher, D. ; Verbeke, W. / Beyond information seeking : Consumers' online deliberation about the risks and benefits of red meat. In: Food Quality and Preference. 2015 ; Vol. 39. pp. 191-201.
@article{89de5d881b7a40dbb638a07459ab08f9,
title = "Beyond information seeking: Consumers' online deliberation about the risks and benefits of red meat",
abstract = "Successfully engaging consumers in a dialogue may provide opportunities for better tailored and more effective communication about food-related risks and benefits. Using an online deliberation concept and software, VIZZATA™, we explored the validity of a behavioral measure of deliberation in an online environment in the context of consumers' perceptions and information seeking about the risks and benefits of red meat. Participants from Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom (n= 150) were given the opportunity to engage in an asynchronous interaction with the research team about the information provided. Online deliberation was operationalized as an individual metric based on the number of questions asked in relation to the information, the number of comments left, the number of glossary terms accessed, and the time spent on deliberative activity. This operationalization provided a coherent measure of deliberation which was positively correlated with information recall about the risks and benefits of red meat. Participants who perceived the information about red meat risks and benefits as too complex engaged less with the information. The study herewith presents a novel method of investigating consumers' deliberation about food issues that conceptualizes consumer engagement as more than just information seeking.",
author = "P. Rutsaert and J. Barnett and R. Gaspar and A. Marcu and Z. Pieniak and B. Seibt and M.L. Lima and D. Fletcher and W. Verbeke",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.011",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "191--201",
journal = "Food Quality and Preference",
issn = "0950-3293",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond information seeking

T2 - Consumers' online deliberation about the risks and benefits of red meat

AU - Rutsaert, P.

AU - Barnett, J.

AU - Gaspar, R.

AU - Marcu, A.

AU - Pieniak, Z.

AU - Seibt, B.

AU - Lima, M.L.

AU - Fletcher, D.

AU - Verbeke, W.

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - Successfully engaging consumers in a dialogue may provide opportunities for better tailored and more effective communication about food-related risks and benefits. Using an online deliberation concept and software, VIZZATA™, we explored the validity of a behavioral measure of deliberation in an online environment in the context of consumers' perceptions and information seeking about the risks and benefits of red meat. Participants from Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom (n= 150) were given the opportunity to engage in an asynchronous interaction with the research team about the information provided. Online deliberation was operationalized as an individual metric based on the number of questions asked in relation to the information, the number of comments left, the number of glossary terms accessed, and the time spent on deliberative activity. This operationalization provided a coherent measure of deliberation which was positively correlated with information recall about the risks and benefits of red meat. Participants who perceived the information about red meat risks and benefits as too complex engaged less with the information. The study herewith presents a novel method of investigating consumers' deliberation about food issues that conceptualizes consumer engagement as more than just information seeking.

AB - Successfully engaging consumers in a dialogue may provide opportunities for better tailored and more effective communication about food-related risks and benefits. Using an online deliberation concept and software, VIZZATA™, we explored the validity of a behavioral measure of deliberation in an online environment in the context of consumers' perceptions and information seeking about the risks and benefits of red meat. Participants from Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom (n= 150) were given the opportunity to engage in an asynchronous interaction with the research team about the information provided. Online deliberation was operationalized as an individual metric based on the number of questions asked in relation to the information, the number of comments left, the number of glossary terms accessed, and the time spent on deliberative activity. This operationalization provided a coherent measure of deliberation which was positively correlated with information recall about the risks and benefits of red meat. Participants who perceived the information about red meat risks and benefits as too complex engaged less with the information. The study herewith presents a novel method of investigating consumers' deliberation about food issues that conceptualizes consumer engagement as more than just information seeking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907303569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.011

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.011

DO - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.011

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 191

EP - 201

JO - Food Quality and Preference

JF - Food Quality and Preference

SN - 0950-3293

ER -