Beyond formulaic research

in praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications

Mats Alvesson, Yiannis Gabriel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prompted by persistent dissatisfaction with research and research publications in organization studies, we critically discuss the standardization of research and publications into formulaic patterns that constrain the imagination and creativity of scholars and restrict the social relevance of their work. Formulaic research involves extreme specialization, an incrementalist and ultra\ cautious attitude toward theoretical contributions, formulaic methodologies, and a standardized article presentation targeted at very narrow and sympathetic academic communities. Formulaic research is attributed to the isomorphism that characterizes a wide range of academic practices. In the hope of galvanizing the field into transformation, we make a number of suggestions for alternative ideals and standards aimed at encouraging more diverse and imaginative ways of practicing and communicating organizational research. This is referred to as polymorphic research. We offer a number of concrete proposals to guide the practices of authors, reviewers, and editors. Polymorphic research, we argue, would reinvigorate the field of organizational studies and enhance its social relevance and impact.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-263
Number of pages19
JournalAcademy of Management, Learning and Education
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Organizational research
specialization
creativity
editor
organization
Creativity
Isomorphism
Organizational studies
Standardization
Organization studies
Dissatisfaction
Methodology
methodology
community
imagination

Cite this

Beyond formulaic research : in praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications. / Alvesson, Mats; Gabriel, Yiannis.

In: Academy of Management, Learning and Education, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.06.2013, p. 245-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1f7d8346e9454e5792ceb0dde00db3de,
title = "Beyond formulaic research: in praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications",
abstract = "Prompted by persistent dissatisfaction with research and research publications in organization studies, we critically discuss the standardization of research and publications into formulaic patterns that constrain the imagination and creativity of scholars and restrict the social relevance of their work. Formulaic research involves extreme specialization, an incrementalist and ultra\ cautious attitude toward theoretical contributions, formulaic methodologies, and a standardized article presentation targeted at very narrow and sympathetic academic communities. Formulaic research is attributed to the isomorphism that characterizes a wide range of academic practices. In the hope of galvanizing the field into transformation, we make a number of suggestions for alternative ideals and standards aimed at encouraging more diverse and imaginative ways of practicing and communicating organizational research. This is referred to as polymorphic research. We offer a number of concrete proposals to guide the practices of authors, reviewers, and editors. Polymorphic research, we argue, would reinvigorate the field of organizational studies and enhance its social relevance and impact.",
author = "Mats Alvesson and Yiannis Gabriel",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/amle.2012.0327",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "245--263",
journal = "Academy of Management, Learning and Education",
issn = "1537-260X",
publisher = "George Washington University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond formulaic research

T2 - in praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications

AU - Alvesson, Mats

AU - Gabriel, Yiannis

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - Prompted by persistent dissatisfaction with research and research publications in organization studies, we critically discuss the standardization of research and publications into formulaic patterns that constrain the imagination and creativity of scholars and restrict the social relevance of their work. Formulaic research involves extreme specialization, an incrementalist and ultra\ cautious attitude toward theoretical contributions, formulaic methodologies, and a standardized article presentation targeted at very narrow and sympathetic academic communities. Formulaic research is attributed to the isomorphism that characterizes a wide range of academic practices. In the hope of galvanizing the field into transformation, we make a number of suggestions for alternative ideals and standards aimed at encouraging more diverse and imaginative ways of practicing and communicating organizational research. This is referred to as polymorphic research. We offer a number of concrete proposals to guide the practices of authors, reviewers, and editors. Polymorphic research, we argue, would reinvigorate the field of organizational studies and enhance its social relevance and impact.

AB - Prompted by persistent dissatisfaction with research and research publications in organization studies, we critically discuss the standardization of research and publications into formulaic patterns that constrain the imagination and creativity of scholars and restrict the social relevance of their work. Formulaic research involves extreme specialization, an incrementalist and ultra\ cautious attitude toward theoretical contributions, formulaic methodologies, and a standardized article presentation targeted at very narrow and sympathetic academic communities. Formulaic research is attributed to the isomorphism that characterizes a wide range of academic practices. In the hope of galvanizing the field into transformation, we make a number of suggestions for alternative ideals and standards aimed at encouraging more diverse and imaginative ways of practicing and communicating organizational research. This is referred to as polymorphic research. We offer a number of concrete proposals to guide the practices of authors, reviewers, and editors. Polymorphic research, we argue, would reinvigorate the field of organizational studies and enhance its social relevance and impact.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890077307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0327

U2 - 10.5465/amle.2012.0327

DO - 10.5465/amle.2012.0327

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 245

EP - 263

JO - Academy of Management, Learning and Education

JF - Academy of Management, Learning and Education

SN - 1537-260X

IS - 2

ER -