Abstract
The history of ideas about development has its roots in mercantilist globalisation, imperialism and colonial ethnography. Progress was framed in the Enlightenment dichotomy of traditional versus modern, and our thinking about transitions from agrarian societies was informed by the Russian debates over extracting rural surpluses to underpin industrial growth. Development as a replication of Western transitions was subsequently critiqued with the “dependista” argument that advanced capitalist countries were “underdeveloping” poorer, ex-colonial ones. Such modes of production and structural analyses still provided alibis for elite misbehaviour, however. Recent post-modern development theory emphasises actor-oriented explanations and heralds a pluralisation of cosmologies, challenging hegemonic Western conceptions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3-21 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Canadian Journal of Development Studies |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 21 Jun 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- agrarian transition
- colonialism
- dependency
- Development theory
- United Kingdom