Abstract
The eightieth anniversary of the Beveridge inquiry is a timely moment to consider how the landmark report is used within contemporary UK politics. Calls for a ‘new Beveridge’ reflect a desire for a rupture with the past and the creation of a radical new welfare consensus. But this reflects a misunderstanding: Beveridge's approach was organic in nature, building on decades of experimentation, politically contested rather than consensual, and intellectually pluralist rather than moored to a single ideological worldview. The real insight Beveridge offers us today flows not from his substantive agenda—which was rooted in a particular set of historic circumstances—but as an approach to securing social reform. Successful welfare advances over the last generation have drawn on these ‘Beveridgean instincts’. Rather than calling for a new twenty-first century blueprint to be handed down from above, reformers should build on experimentation and successful incremental change, from within the UK and abroad.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 8-15 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Political Quarterly |
Volume | 94 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Jan 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We are very grateful to Tom Clark, Andrew Gamble, Nick Timmins and the editors of The Political Quarterly for their astute comments on a first draft of this article.
Keywords
- Beveridge Report
- British politics
- political economy
- welfare state reform
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science