TY - JOUR
T1 - Between-Day Reliability and Usefulness of a Fitness Testing Battery in Youth Sport Athletes
T2 - Reference Data for Practitioners
AU - Sawczuk, Thomas
AU - Jones, Ben
AU - Scantlebury, Sean
AU - Weakley, Jonathan
AU - Read, Dale
AU - Costello, Nessan
AU - Darrall-Jones, Joshua David
AU - Stokes, Keith
AU - Till, Kevin
PY - 2017/8/23
Y1 - 2017/8/23
N2 - This study aimed to evaluate the between-day reliability and usefulness of a fitness testing battery in a group of youth sport athletes. Fifty-nine youth sport athletes (age = 17.3 ± 0.7 years) undertook a fitness testing battery including the isometric mid-thigh pull, counter-movement jump, 5–40 m sprint splits, and the 5–0-5 change of direction test on two occasions separated by 7 days. Usefulness was assessed by comparing the reliability (typical error) to the smallest worthwhile change. The typical error was 5.5% for isometric mid-thigh pull and 3.8% for counter-movement jump. The typical error values were 2.7, 2.5, 2.2, 2.2, and 1.8% for the 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 m sprint splits, and 4.1% (left) and 5.4% (right) for the 5–0-5 tests. The smallest worthwhile change ranged from 1.1 to 6.1%. All tests were identified as having “good” or “acceptable” reliability. The isometric mid-thigh pull and counter-movement jump had “good” usefulness, all other tests had “marginal” usefulness.
AB - This study aimed to evaluate the between-day reliability and usefulness of a fitness testing battery in a group of youth sport athletes. Fifty-nine youth sport athletes (age = 17.3 ± 0.7 years) undertook a fitness testing battery including the isometric mid-thigh pull, counter-movement jump, 5–40 m sprint splits, and the 5–0-5 change of direction test on two occasions separated by 7 days. Usefulness was assessed by comparing the reliability (typical error) to the smallest worthwhile change. The typical error was 5.5% for isometric mid-thigh pull and 3.8% for counter-movement jump. The typical error values were 2.7, 2.5, 2.2, 2.2, and 1.8% for the 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 m sprint splits, and 4.1% (left) and 5.4% (right) for the 5–0-5 tests. The smallest worthwhile change ranged from 1.1 to 6.1%. All tests were identified as having “good” or “acceptable” reliability. The isometric mid-thigh pull and counter-movement jump had “good” usefulness, all other tests had “marginal” usefulness.
KW - fitness testing
KW - power
KW - reliability
KW - speed
KW - strength
KW - usefulness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028559727&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2017.1360304
U2 - 10.1080/1091367X.2017.1360304
DO - 10.1080/1091367X.2017.1360304
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85028559727
SN - 1091-367X
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
JF - Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
ER -