Benefit corporation legislation and the emergence of a social hybrid category

Hans Rawhouser, Michael Cummings, Andrew Crane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research highlights tensions that social hybrids face by spanning categories. This article explores the emergence of legislation to support a new category for social hybrids, focusing on Benefit Corporation legislation in the United States. It presents quantitative analysis of state-level factors that make a state suitable for a social hybrid category (attractiveness for for-profit business and nonprofits, existing social hybrid organizations, legislative intensity, and political leanings) followed by qualitative analysis of the arguments marshaled for the creation of the Benefit Corporation legal form. These findings raise important insights for research on social hybrids and suggest a range of practical implications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-35
Number of pages23
JournalCalifornia Management Review
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2015

Fingerprint

Legislation
Hybrid organizations
Attractiveness
Quantitative analysis
Factors
Qualitative analysis

Keywords

  • Legal aspects of business
  • Nonprofit sector
  • Policy making
  • Public policy
  • Stakeholders

Cite this

Benefit corporation legislation and the emergence of a social hybrid category. / Rawhouser, Hans; Cummings, Michael; Crane, Andrew.

In: California Management Review, Vol. 57, No. 3, 01.05.2015, p. 13-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fd57db741ecc43048595468afb76ab7b,
title = "Benefit corporation legislation and the emergence of a social hybrid category",
abstract = "Previous research highlights tensions that social hybrids face by spanning categories. This article explores the emergence of legislation to support a new category for social hybrids, focusing on Benefit Corporation legislation in the United States. It presents quantitative analysis of state-level factors that make a state suitable for a social hybrid category (attractiveness for for-profit business and nonprofits, existing social hybrid organizations, legislative intensity, and political leanings) followed by qualitative analysis of the arguments marshaled for the creation of the Benefit Corporation legal form. These findings raise important insights for research on social hybrids and suggest a range of practical implications.",
keywords = "Legal aspects of business, Nonprofit sector, Policy making, Public policy, Stakeholders",
author = "Hans Rawhouser and Michael Cummings and Andrew Crane",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.13",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "13--35",
journal = "California Management Review",
issn = "0008-1256",
publisher = "Haas School of Business",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefit corporation legislation and the emergence of a social hybrid category

AU - Rawhouser, Hans

AU - Cummings, Michael

AU - Crane, Andrew

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Previous research highlights tensions that social hybrids face by spanning categories. This article explores the emergence of legislation to support a new category for social hybrids, focusing on Benefit Corporation legislation in the United States. It presents quantitative analysis of state-level factors that make a state suitable for a social hybrid category (attractiveness for for-profit business and nonprofits, existing social hybrid organizations, legislative intensity, and political leanings) followed by qualitative analysis of the arguments marshaled for the creation of the Benefit Corporation legal form. These findings raise important insights for research on social hybrids and suggest a range of practical implications.

AB - Previous research highlights tensions that social hybrids face by spanning categories. This article explores the emergence of legislation to support a new category for social hybrids, focusing on Benefit Corporation legislation in the United States. It presents quantitative analysis of state-level factors that make a state suitable for a social hybrid category (attractiveness for for-profit business and nonprofits, existing social hybrid organizations, legislative intensity, and political leanings) followed by qualitative analysis of the arguments marshaled for the creation of the Benefit Corporation legal form. These findings raise important insights for research on social hybrids and suggest a range of practical implications.

KW - Legal aspects of business

KW - Nonprofit sector

KW - Policy making

KW - Public policy

KW - Stakeholders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930813148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.13

U2 - 10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.13

DO - 10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.13

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 13

EP - 35

JO - California Management Review

JF - California Management Review

SN - 0008-1256

IS - 3

ER -