Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation

the effectiveness of different interventions types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers

Rosemary Hiscock, Susan Murray, Leonie S. Brose, Andy McEwen, Jo Leonardi Bee, Fiona Dobbie, Linda Bauld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)
70 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background:
Disadvantaged smokers are less likely to be successful when trying to stop smoking than more affluent smokers. In the UK, NHS Stop Smoking Services (SSS) provide a range of pharmacotherapy and behavioural support, delivered by advisors with a range of backgrounds. Whether the types of support provided and who provides it influence differences in quit rates amongst low SES smokers compared with high SES smokers has not previously been examined.

Methods:
202,084 records of smokers in England who attended a NHS Stop Smoking Service between July 2010 and June 2011 were acquired. Smokers were followed-up by services at four weeks post quit date. Multilevel logistic regression models of CO validated quits were employed. Disadvantage was explored through the National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC) and by eligibility for free prescriptions, an indicator of low income amongst adults aged between 19 and 59 in England.

Results:
Affluent smokers were more likely to quit than disadvantaged smokers (OR 1.38 (1.35 to 1.42) for clients who paid for prescriptions compared to those eligible for free prescriptions). 80% of service clients received one-to-one counselling but open group forms of behavioural therapy were more successful (main effect OR 1.26 (1.12 to 1.41)) except amongst some of the most disadvantaged clients (long-term unemployed and prisoners). Closed groups were little deployed and they were not significantly more successful than one-to-one behavioural therapy after controls. Who delivered treatment did make a difference for some clients, with all but the most affluent less likely to be successful if they had been treated by a nurse compared with other types of advisers, including smoking cessation specialists (main effect OR 0.73 (0.65 to 0.83)).

Conclusion:
This study provides further evidence that disadvantaged smokers find quitting more difficult even when they have attended a smoking cessation programme. The findings suggest that open groups should be promoted, although they may not be as effective as other forms of behavioural therapy for the long-term unemployed or prisoners. Further research is required to explore why most groups of smokers who attended services staffed by nurses were less likely to quit than those who received treatment from other types of advisors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2787-2796
Number of pages10
JournalAddictive Behaviors
Volume38
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Drug therapy
Vulnerable Populations
Smoking Cessation
Carbon Monoxide
Logistics
Statistics
Economics
Prescriptions
Prisoners
Smoking
England
Logistic Models
Nurses
Therapeutics
Counseling
Drug Therapy
Research

Cite this

Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation : the effectiveness of different interventions types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers. / Hiscock, Rosemary; Murray, Susan; Brose, Leonie S.; McEwen, Andy; Leonardi Bee, Jo; Dobbie, Fiona; Bauld, Linda.

In: Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 38, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 2787-2796.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hiscock, Rosemary ; Murray, Susan ; Brose, Leonie S. ; McEwen, Andy ; Leonardi Bee, Jo ; Dobbie, Fiona ; Bauld, Linda. / Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation : the effectiveness of different interventions types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers. In: Addictive Behaviors. 2013 ; Vol. 38, No. 11. pp. 2787-2796.
@article{ec88064681324bf085603883a8560504,
title = "Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation: the effectiveness of different interventions types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers",
abstract = "Background:Disadvantaged smokers are less likely to be successful when trying to stop smoking than more affluent smokers. In the UK, NHS Stop Smoking Services (SSS) provide a range of pharmacotherapy and behavioural support, delivered by advisors with a range of backgrounds. Whether the types of support provided and who provides it influence differences in quit rates amongst low SES smokers compared with high SES smokers has not previously been examined.Methods:202,084 records of smokers in England who attended a NHS Stop Smoking Service between July 2010 and June 2011 were acquired. Smokers were followed-up by services at four weeks post quit date. Multilevel logistic regression models of CO validated quits were employed. Disadvantage was explored through the National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC) and by eligibility for free prescriptions, an indicator of low income amongst adults aged between 19 and 59 in England.Results:Affluent smokers were more likely to quit than disadvantaged smokers (OR 1.38 (1.35 to 1.42) for clients who paid for prescriptions compared to those eligible for free prescriptions). 80{\%} of service clients received one-to-one counselling but open group forms of behavioural therapy were more successful (main effect OR 1.26 (1.12 to 1.41)) except amongst some of the most disadvantaged clients (long-term unemployed and prisoners). Closed groups were little deployed and they were not significantly more successful than one-to-one behavioural therapy after controls. Who delivered treatment did make a difference for some clients, with all but the most affluent less likely to be successful if they had been treated by a nurse compared with other types of advisers, including smoking cessation specialists (main effect OR 0.73 (0.65 to 0.83)).Conclusion:This study provides further evidence that disadvantaged smokers find quitting more difficult even when they have attended a smoking cessation programme. The findings suggest that open groups should be promoted, although they may not be as effective as other forms of behavioural therapy for the long-term unemployed or prisoners. Further research is required to explore why most groups of smokers who attended services staffed by nurses were less likely to quit than those who received treatment from other types of advisors.",
author = "Rosemary Hiscock and Susan Murray and Brose, {Leonie S.} and Andy McEwen and {Leonardi Bee}, Jo and Fiona Dobbie and Linda Bauld",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.010",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "2787--2796",
journal = "Addictive Behaviors",
issn = "0306-4603",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation

T2 - the effectiveness of different interventions types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers

AU - Hiscock, Rosemary

AU - Murray, Susan

AU - Brose, Leonie S.

AU - McEwen, Andy

AU - Leonardi Bee, Jo

AU - Dobbie, Fiona

AU - Bauld, Linda

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Background:Disadvantaged smokers are less likely to be successful when trying to stop smoking than more affluent smokers. In the UK, NHS Stop Smoking Services (SSS) provide a range of pharmacotherapy and behavioural support, delivered by advisors with a range of backgrounds. Whether the types of support provided and who provides it influence differences in quit rates amongst low SES smokers compared with high SES smokers has not previously been examined.Methods:202,084 records of smokers in England who attended a NHS Stop Smoking Service between July 2010 and June 2011 were acquired. Smokers were followed-up by services at four weeks post quit date. Multilevel logistic regression models of CO validated quits were employed. Disadvantage was explored through the National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC) and by eligibility for free prescriptions, an indicator of low income amongst adults aged between 19 and 59 in England.Results:Affluent smokers were more likely to quit than disadvantaged smokers (OR 1.38 (1.35 to 1.42) for clients who paid for prescriptions compared to those eligible for free prescriptions). 80% of service clients received one-to-one counselling but open group forms of behavioural therapy were more successful (main effect OR 1.26 (1.12 to 1.41)) except amongst some of the most disadvantaged clients (long-term unemployed and prisoners). Closed groups were little deployed and they were not significantly more successful than one-to-one behavioural therapy after controls. Who delivered treatment did make a difference for some clients, with all but the most affluent less likely to be successful if they had been treated by a nurse compared with other types of advisers, including smoking cessation specialists (main effect OR 0.73 (0.65 to 0.83)).Conclusion:This study provides further evidence that disadvantaged smokers find quitting more difficult even when they have attended a smoking cessation programme. The findings suggest that open groups should be promoted, although they may not be as effective as other forms of behavioural therapy for the long-term unemployed or prisoners. Further research is required to explore why most groups of smokers who attended services staffed by nurses were less likely to quit than those who received treatment from other types of advisors.

AB - Background:Disadvantaged smokers are less likely to be successful when trying to stop smoking than more affluent smokers. In the UK, NHS Stop Smoking Services (SSS) provide a range of pharmacotherapy and behavioural support, delivered by advisors with a range of backgrounds. Whether the types of support provided and who provides it influence differences in quit rates amongst low SES smokers compared with high SES smokers has not previously been examined.Methods:202,084 records of smokers in England who attended a NHS Stop Smoking Service between July 2010 and June 2011 were acquired. Smokers were followed-up by services at four weeks post quit date. Multilevel logistic regression models of CO validated quits were employed. Disadvantage was explored through the National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC) and by eligibility for free prescriptions, an indicator of low income amongst adults aged between 19 and 59 in England.Results:Affluent smokers were more likely to quit than disadvantaged smokers (OR 1.38 (1.35 to 1.42) for clients who paid for prescriptions compared to those eligible for free prescriptions). 80% of service clients received one-to-one counselling but open group forms of behavioural therapy were more successful (main effect OR 1.26 (1.12 to 1.41)) except amongst some of the most disadvantaged clients (long-term unemployed and prisoners). Closed groups were little deployed and they were not significantly more successful than one-to-one behavioural therapy after controls. Who delivered treatment did make a difference for some clients, with all but the most affluent less likely to be successful if they had been treated by a nurse compared with other types of advisers, including smoking cessation specialists (main effect OR 0.73 (0.65 to 0.83)).Conclusion:This study provides further evidence that disadvantaged smokers find quitting more difficult even when they have attended a smoking cessation programme. The findings suggest that open groups should be promoted, although they may not be as effective as other forms of behavioural therapy for the long-term unemployed or prisoners. Further research is required to explore why most groups of smokers who attended services staffed by nurses were less likely to quit than those who received treatment from other types of advisors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882770728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.010

U2 - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.010

DO - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.010

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 2787

EP - 2796

JO - Addictive Behaviors

JF - Addictive Behaviors

SN - 0306-4603

IS - 11

ER -