Abstract
This short paper reflects on the key lessons we can learn from the political debate around and policy experimentation with (emergency) basic income schemes in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. While the pandemic crisis initially seems to have opened up a policy window for introducing a basic income as a crisis instrument, theoretical arguments and empirical observations strongly suggest the reliance of some basic income advocates on crisis events, such as the pandemic, to push forward their policy ideas involves wishful thinking rather than political reality. A feasible roadmap towards introducing basic income requires the hard work of raising public awareness, constructing broad constituencies, and building robust political coalitions rather than waiting for the next crisis to come around the corner.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 167-174 |
| Journal | Global Policy |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 29 Oct 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Feb 2025 |
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Troy Henderson for discussions related to emergency basic income and its impact on basic income policy development that have informed this commentary.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Basic Income in Crisis? (Hard) Lessons from the Pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS