Barriers to proactive environmental management in the United Kingdom: implications for business and public policy

Frederik Dahlmann, Stephen Brammer, Andrew Millington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 16 Citations

Abstract

Existing conceptual and empirical contributions emphasise the significant payoffs available to companies who can manage the effect that they have on the environment (Porter and van der Linde, 1995; Christmann, 2000; Hart, 1997; Aragón-Correa et al., 2004). In spite of this, empirical evidence concerning the extent to which companies have embedded environmentally sensitive business practices within their different management functions remains very mixed (Hillary, 2000; Post and Altman; 1994; Ghobadian et al., 1995). In this study we explore this apparent puzzle by investigating corporate perceptions of the main barriers and obstacles to more effective management of their environmental impacts in the context of a sample of over 150 UK companies drawn from six industries. Using a mixed methodological approach incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods, our findings suggest that both internal and external barriers play important roles in retarding the willingness and ability of British industry to become more proactive in managing its environmental impacts.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-20
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of General Management
Volume33
Issue number3
StatusPublished - 1 Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Public policy
Environmental management
Industry
Business policy
Environmental impact
Quantitative methods
Qualitative methods
Empirical evidence
Willingness
Business practices

Keywords

  • Management research
  • Management science
  • Industrial management.
  • Environmental management

Cite this

Barriers to proactive environmental management in the United Kingdom: implications for business and public policy. / Dahlmann, Frederik; Brammer, Stephen; Millington, Andrew.

In: Journal of General Management, Vol. 33, No. 3 , 01.03.2008, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{769a807dedb04af9a19a3a1ea3e4f918,
title = "Barriers to proactive environmental management in the United Kingdom: implications for business and public policy",
abstract = "Existing conceptual and empirical contributions emphasise the significant payoffs available to companies who can manage the effect that they have on the environment (Porter and van der Linde, 1995; Christmann, 2000; Hart, 1997; Arag{\'o}n-Correa et al., 2004). In spite of this, empirical evidence concerning the extent to which companies have embedded environmentally sensitive business practices within their different management functions remains very mixed (Hillary, 2000; Post and Altman; 1994; Ghobadian et al., 1995). In this study we explore this apparent puzzle by investigating corporate perceptions of the main barriers and obstacles to more effective management of their environmental impacts in the context of a sample of over 150 UK companies drawn from six industries. Using a mixed methodological approach incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods, our findings suggest that both internal and external barriers play important roles in retarding the willingness and ability of British industry to become more proactive in managing its environmental impacts.",
keywords = "Management research, Management science, Industrial management., Environmental management",
author = "Frederik Dahlmann and Stephen Brammer and Andrew Millington",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of General Management",
issn = "0306-3070",
publisher = "Braybrooke Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to proactive environmental management in the United Kingdom: implications for business and public policy

AU - Dahlmann,Frederik

AU - Brammer,Stephen

AU - Millington,Andrew

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - Existing conceptual and empirical contributions emphasise the significant payoffs available to companies who can manage the effect that they have on the environment (Porter and van der Linde, 1995; Christmann, 2000; Hart, 1997; Aragón-Correa et al., 2004). In spite of this, empirical evidence concerning the extent to which companies have embedded environmentally sensitive business practices within their different management functions remains very mixed (Hillary, 2000; Post and Altman; 1994; Ghobadian et al., 1995). In this study we explore this apparent puzzle by investigating corporate perceptions of the main barriers and obstacles to more effective management of their environmental impacts in the context of a sample of over 150 UK companies drawn from six industries. Using a mixed methodological approach incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods, our findings suggest that both internal and external barriers play important roles in retarding the willingness and ability of British industry to become more proactive in managing its environmental impacts.

AB - Existing conceptual and empirical contributions emphasise the significant payoffs available to companies who can manage the effect that they have on the environment (Porter and van der Linde, 1995; Christmann, 2000; Hart, 1997; Aragón-Correa et al., 2004). In spite of this, empirical evidence concerning the extent to which companies have embedded environmentally sensitive business practices within their different management functions remains very mixed (Hillary, 2000; Post and Altman; 1994; Ghobadian et al., 1995). In this study we explore this apparent puzzle by investigating corporate perceptions of the main barriers and obstacles to more effective management of their environmental impacts in the context of a sample of over 150 UK companies drawn from six industries. Using a mixed methodological approach incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods, our findings suggest that both internal and external barriers play important roles in retarding the willingness and ability of British industry to become more proactive in managing its environmental impacts.

KW - Management research

KW - Management science

KW - Industrial management.

KW - Environmental management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43149093997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.braybrooke.co.uk/jgm/

UR - http://search.ebscohost.com.ezp2.bath.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=32695341&site=ehost-live

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of General Management

T2 - Journal of General Management

JF - Journal of General Management

SN - 0306-3070

IS - 3

ER -