Balance sheet conservatism and audit reporting conservatism

Asad Kausar, Clive Lennox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 4 Citations

Abstract

Financial reports are prepared on a going-concern (GC) basis rather than a liquidation basis even when companies are highly distressed. This allows distressed companies to report book values of assets that greatly exceed their liquidation values, implying a lack of conservatism in the balance sheet. We argue that auditors issue going-concern opinions in order to warn investors about this lack of balance sheet conservatism. This argument leads to two testable hypotheses. First, for companies that are at risk of bankruptcy, auditors are more likely to issue GC opinions when the book values of assets under the GC assumption are high relative to the expected liquidation values of assets (i.e., when the GC assumption causes the balance sheet to lack conservatism). Second, for companies that enter bankruptcy, the issuance of a prior GC opinion has predictive information content with respect to the wedge between the book values of assets and the future liquidation values of those same assets. Our results strongly support both hypotheses. The findings are important because they indicate that conservative audit reporting helps to compensate for a lack of conservatism in the balance sheet, which arises because the GC assumption permits the book values of assets to exceed their liquidation values.

LanguageEnglish
Pages897-924
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Business Finance and Accounting
Volume44
Issue number7-8
Early online date19 Apr 2017
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Assets
Balance sheet
Audit reporting
Conservatism
Liquidation
Going concern
Book value
Going concern opinion
Auditors
Bankruptcy
Investors
Information content

Keywords

  • book values
  • conservatism
  • going concern audit opinions
  • liquidation values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Finance

Cite this

Balance sheet conservatism and audit reporting conservatism. / Kausar, Asad; Lennox, Clive.

In: Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 44, No. 7-8, 01.07.2017, p. 897-924.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a446fe6c8e94f409964eb91a36a1ef3,
title = "Balance sheet conservatism and audit reporting conservatism",
abstract = "Financial reports are prepared on a going-concern (GC) basis rather than a liquidation basis even when companies are highly distressed. This allows distressed companies to report book values of assets that greatly exceed their liquidation values, implying a lack of conservatism in the balance sheet. We argue that auditors issue going-concern opinions in order to warn investors about this lack of balance sheet conservatism. This argument leads to two testable hypotheses. First, for companies that are at risk of bankruptcy, auditors are more likely to issue GC opinions when the book values of assets under the GC assumption are high relative to the expected liquidation values of assets (i.e., when the GC assumption causes the balance sheet to lack conservatism). Second, for companies that enter bankruptcy, the issuance of a prior GC opinion has predictive information content with respect to the wedge between the book values of assets and the future liquidation values of those same assets. Our results strongly support both hypotheses. The findings are important because they indicate that conservative audit reporting helps to compensate for a lack of conservatism in the balance sheet, which arises because the GC assumption permits the book values of assets to exceed their liquidation values.",
keywords = "book values, conservatism, going concern audit opinions, liquidation values",
author = "Asad Kausar and Clive Lennox",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jbfa.12256",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "897--924",
journal = "Journal of Business Finance and Accounting",
issn = "0306-686X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7-8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Balance sheet conservatism and audit reporting conservatism

AU - Kausar, Asad

AU - Lennox, Clive

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Financial reports are prepared on a going-concern (GC) basis rather than a liquidation basis even when companies are highly distressed. This allows distressed companies to report book values of assets that greatly exceed their liquidation values, implying a lack of conservatism in the balance sheet. We argue that auditors issue going-concern opinions in order to warn investors about this lack of balance sheet conservatism. This argument leads to two testable hypotheses. First, for companies that are at risk of bankruptcy, auditors are more likely to issue GC opinions when the book values of assets under the GC assumption are high relative to the expected liquidation values of assets (i.e., when the GC assumption causes the balance sheet to lack conservatism). Second, for companies that enter bankruptcy, the issuance of a prior GC opinion has predictive information content with respect to the wedge between the book values of assets and the future liquidation values of those same assets. Our results strongly support both hypotheses. The findings are important because they indicate that conservative audit reporting helps to compensate for a lack of conservatism in the balance sheet, which arises because the GC assumption permits the book values of assets to exceed their liquidation values.

AB - Financial reports are prepared on a going-concern (GC) basis rather than a liquidation basis even when companies are highly distressed. This allows distressed companies to report book values of assets that greatly exceed their liquidation values, implying a lack of conservatism in the balance sheet. We argue that auditors issue going-concern opinions in order to warn investors about this lack of balance sheet conservatism. This argument leads to two testable hypotheses. First, for companies that are at risk of bankruptcy, auditors are more likely to issue GC opinions when the book values of assets under the GC assumption are high relative to the expected liquidation values of assets (i.e., when the GC assumption causes the balance sheet to lack conservatism). Second, for companies that enter bankruptcy, the issuance of a prior GC opinion has predictive information content with respect to the wedge between the book values of assets and the future liquidation values of those same assets. Our results strongly support both hypotheses. The findings are important because they indicate that conservative audit reporting helps to compensate for a lack of conservatism in the balance sheet, which arises because the GC assumption permits the book values of assets to exceed their liquidation values.

KW - book values

KW - conservatism

KW - going concern audit opinions

KW - liquidation values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020037313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jbfa.12256

DO - 10.1111/jbfa.12256

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 897

EP - 924

JO - Journal of Business Finance and Accounting

T2 - Journal of Business Finance and Accounting

JF - Journal of Business Finance and Accounting

SN - 0306-686X

IS - 7-8

ER -