Autonomy or dependence - or both?: Perspectives from Bangladesh

Joe Devine, L Camfield, Ian Gough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The idea of personal autonomy is central to many accounts of eudaimonic well-being. Yet it is often criticized as a Western concept celebrating individualism and independence over group obligations and interdependence or dependence. This paper rejects this view and argues that coherent accounts of autonomy must always recognize the interdependence of people in groups, and that autonomy can coexist with substantial relationships of dependence. It illustrates this drawing on evidence from Bangladesh, a poor country usually absent from cross-cultural studies and one where personal relationships of hierarchy and dependence are endemic. Argument and evidence are presented showing the coexistence of personal autonomy and dependence, and the relationship between collective action and autonomy. We also address some of the specific problems encountered in researching autonomy in a social context where it is mainly expressed in relational forms. We conclude that autonomy can be directed toward both personal and social goals, and can be enacted individually, or by participation in groups. Autonomy is a universal psychological need but its expression is always contextual.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-138
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Happiness Studies
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

Bangladesh
autonomy
interdependence
Group
individualism
coexistence
cultural studies
collective behavior
evidence
obligation
well-being
participation

Cite this

Autonomy or dependence - or both?: Perspectives from Bangladesh. / Devine, Joe; Camfield, L; Gough, Ian.

In: Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 105-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ff10162d5d145fb9cd433ed89a8de8f,
title = "Autonomy or dependence - or both?: Perspectives from Bangladesh",
abstract = "The idea of personal autonomy is central to many accounts of eudaimonic well-being. Yet it is often criticized as a Western concept celebrating individualism and independence over group obligations and interdependence or dependence. This paper rejects this view and argues that coherent accounts of autonomy must always recognize the interdependence of people in groups, and that autonomy can coexist with substantial relationships of dependence. It illustrates this drawing on evidence from Bangladesh, a poor country usually absent from cross-cultural studies and one where personal relationships of hierarchy and dependence are endemic. Argument and evidence are presented showing the coexistence of personal autonomy and dependence, and the relationship between collective action and autonomy. We also address some of the specific problems encountered in researching autonomy in a social context where it is mainly expressed in relational forms. We conclude that autonomy can be directed toward both personal and social goals, and can be enacted individually, or by participation in groups. Autonomy is a universal psychological need but its expression is always contextual.",
author = "Joe Devine and L Camfield and Ian Gough",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10902-006-9022-5",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "105--138",
journal = "Journal of Happiness Studies",
issn = "1389-4978",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Autonomy or dependence - or both?: Perspectives from Bangladesh

AU - Devine, Joe

AU - Camfield, L

AU - Gough, Ian

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - The idea of personal autonomy is central to many accounts of eudaimonic well-being. Yet it is often criticized as a Western concept celebrating individualism and independence over group obligations and interdependence or dependence. This paper rejects this view and argues that coherent accounts of autonomy must always recognize the interdependence of people in groups, and that autonomy can coexist with substantial relationships of dependence. It illustrates this drawing on evidence from Bangladesh, a poor country usually absent from cross-cultural studies and one where personal relationships of hierarchy and dependence are endemic. Argument and evidence are presented showing the coexistence of personal autonomy and dependence, and the relationship between collective action and autonomy. We also address some of the specific problems encountered in researching autonomy in a social context where it is mainly expressed in relational forms. We conclude that autonomy can be directed toward both personal and social goals, and can be enacted individually, or by participation in groups. Autonomy is a universal psychological need but its expression is always contextual.

AB - The idea of personal autonomy is central to many accounts of eudaimonic well-being. Yet it is often criticized as a Western concept celebrating individualism and independence over group obligations and interdependence or dependence. This paper rejects this view and argues that coherent accounts of autonomy must always recognize the interdependence of people in groups, and that autonomy can coexist with substantial relationships of dependence. It illustrates this drawing on evidence from Bangladesh, a poor country usually absent from cross-cultural studies and one where personal relationships of hierarchy and dependence are endemic. Argument and evidence are presented showing the coexistence of personal autonomy and dependence, and the relationship between collective action and autonomy. We also address some of the specific problems encountered in researching autonomy in a social context where it is mainly expressed in relational forms. We conclude that autonomy can be directed toward both personal and social goals, and can be enacted individually, or by participation in groups. Autonomy is a universal psychological need but its expression is always contextual.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349193391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9022-5

U2 - 10.1007/s10902-006-9022-5

DO - 10.1007/s10902-006-9022-5

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 105

EP - 138

JO - Journal of Happiness Studies

JF - Journal of Happiness Studies

SN - 1389-4978

IS - 1

ER -