Autonomy in Latin America: between resistance and integration. Echoes from the Piqueteros experience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article argues that the concrete practice of autonomy by social movements is deeply embedded in socioeconomic and political contexts, and as such involves a contested relationship in and against the state, the market and hegemonic discourses on development. The task is then to explain and learn from this contested character of autonomy in each context, the processes by which social movements' autonomous practices remain vibrant, how they engage with the state, how they become institutionalized (if so) and the implications of such ‘contested institutionalization’ for social movements and the state. This argument is explored through the case of the Argentina unemployed workers or Piqueteros movement, taking the specific example of the municipality of General Mosconi. The ability of the unemployed workers to force the state and local enterprises to adapt to their demands and to give support with minimum intervention is seen as an example to other parts of the world of how autonomous community processes can both engage with the state whereas retaining their own dynamics and control.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)356-366
Number of pages11
JournalCommunity Development Journal
Volume45
Issue number3
Early online date17 May 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

social movement
autonomy
Social Movements
Latin America
worker
experience
institutionalization
Argentina
municipality
market
discourse
ability
community

Cite this

@article{172eb821004f4c1cb780a42206b53801,
title = "Autonomy in Latin America: between resistance and integration. Echoes from the Piqueteros experience",
abstract = "This article argues that the concrete practice of autonomy by social movements is deeply embedded in socioeconomic and political contexts, and as such involves a contested relationship in and against the state, the market and hegemonic discourses on development. The task is then to explain and learn from this contested character of autonomy in each context, the processes by which social movements' autonomous practices remain vibrant, how they engage with the state, how they become institutionalized (if so) and the implications of such ‘contested institutionalization’ for social movements and the state. This argument is explored through the case of the Argentina unemployed workers or Piqueteros movement, taking the specific example of the municipality of General Mosconi. The ability of the unemployed workers to force the state and local enterprises to adapt to their demands and to give support with minimum intervention is seen as an example to other parts of the world of how autonomous community processes can both engage with the state whereas retaining their own dynamics and control.",
author = "Dinerstein, {Ana Cecilia}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1093/cdj/bsq029",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "356--366",
journal = "Community Development Journal",
issn = "0010-3802",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Autonomy in Latin America: between resistance and integration. Echoes from the Piqueteros experience

AU - Dinerstein, Ana Cecilia

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - This article argues that the concrete practice of autonomy by social movements is deeply embedded in socioeconomic and political contexts, and as such involves a contested relationship in and against the state, the market and hegemonic discourses on development. The task is then to explain and learn from this contested character of autonomy in each context, the processes by which social movements' autonomous practices remain vibrant, how they engage with the state, how they become institutionalized (if so) and the implications of such ‘contested institutionalization’ for social movements and the state. This argument is explored through the case of the Argentina unemployed workers or Piqueteros movement, taking the specific example of the municipality of General Mosconi. The ability of the unemployed workers to force the state and local enterprises to adapt to their demands and to give support with minimum intervention is seen as an example to other parts of the world of how autonomous community processes can both engage with the state whereas retaining their own dynamics and control.

AB - This article argues that the concrete practice of autonomy by social movements is deeply embedded in socioeconomic and political contexts, and as such involves a contested relationship in and against the state, the market and hegemonic discourses on development. The task is then to explain and learn from this contested character of autonomy in each context, the processes by which social movements' autonomous practices remain vibrant, how they engage with the state, how they become institutionalized (if so) and the implications of such ‘contested institutionalization’ for social movements and the state. This argument is explored through the case of the Argentina unemployed workers or Piqueteros movement, taking the specific example of the municipality of General Mosconi. The ability of the unemployed workers to force the state and local enterprises to adapt to their demands and to give support with minimum intervention is seen as an example to other parts of the world of how autonomous community processes can both engage with the state whereas retaining their own dynamics and control.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954435425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsq029

U2 - 10.1093/cdj/bsq029

DO - 10.1093/cdj/bsq029

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 356

EP - 366

JO - Community Development Journal

JF - Community Development Journal

SN - 0010-3802

IS - 3

ER -