Automating Video-Based Two-Dimensional Motion Analysis in Sport? Implications for Gait Event Detection, Pose Estimation, and Performance Parameter Analysis

Marion Mundt, Steffi Colyer, Logan Wade, Laurie Needham, Murray Evans, Emma Millett, Jacqueline Alderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Two-dimensional (2D) video is a common tool used during sports training and competition to analyze movement. In these videos, biomechanists determine key events, annotate joint centers, and calculate spatial, temporal, and kinematic parameters to provide performance reports to coaches and athletes. Automatic tools relying on computer vision and artificial intelligence methods hold promise to reduce the need for time-consuming manual methods.

Objective: This study systematically analyzed the steps required to automate the video analysis workflow by investigating the applicability of a threshold-based event detection algorithm developed for 3D marker trajectories to 2D video data at four sampling rates; the agreement of 2D keypoints estimated by an off-the-shelf pose estimation model compared with gold-standard 3D marker trajectories projected to camera's field of view; and the influence of an offset in event detection on contact time and the sagittal knee joint angle at the key critical events of touch down and foot flat.

Methods
Repeated measures limits of agreement were used to compare parameters determined by markerless and marker-based motion capture.

Results: Results highlighted that a minimum video sampling rate of 100 Hz is required to detect key events, and the limited applicability of 3D marker trajectory-based event detection algorithms when using 2D video. Although detected keypoints showed good agreement with the gold-standard, misidentification of key events—such as touch down by 20 ms resulted in knee compression angle differences of up to 20°.

Conclusion: These findings emphasize the need for de novo accurate key event detection algorithms to automate 2D video analysis pipelines.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14693
JournalScandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
Volume34
Issue number7
Early online date10 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2024

Data Availability Statement

The dataset is currently under review to be published.

Funding

This research was part-funded by CAMERA, the RCUK Centre for the Analysis of Motion, Entertainment Research and Applications, EP/M023281/1 and EP/T014865/1, the Australian Institute of Sport, AIS Research Grant Number 0003223, and the UWA Tech and Policy Lab at the University of Western Australia.

Keywords

  • 3D marker trajectory projection
  • OpenPose
  • knee angle
  • running
  • sampling frequency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Automating Video-Based Two-Dimensional Motion Analysis in Sport? Implications for Gait Event Detection, Pose Estimation, and Performance Parameter Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this