Automatic Design Structure Matrices: A Comparison of Two Formula Student Projects

James Gopsill, Ben Hicks, Christopher Snider, Sian Joel-Edgar, Lia Emanuel

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

Design Structure Matrices have become a fundamental tool to support engineers in their handling and management of interactions across product & organisational architectures. Recent work in the field has exploited the opportunity afforded by Product Lifecycle Management systems, which capture the digital footprint of engineering projects to generate Design Structure Matrices in real-time through the co-occurrence of edits to product models. Given the systematic and more objective nature of the generation of these DSMs as well as being able to monitor their evolution throughout engineering projects, there now lies an opportunity in comparing projects/products using DSMs.To investigate this and the potential insights that could be generated, this paper presents the automatic generation of DSMs for two Formula Student projects. These have then been compared with respect to the end-of-project, change propagation characteristics and evolution of the DSMs. From this analysis, six insights have been generated that map the characteristics of the DSMs to the performance of the project/product and highlights the potential of automatic DSMs to further support engineering project management.

Conference

Conference21st International Conference on Engineering Design
Abbreviated titleICED17
CountryCanada
CityVancouver
Period21/08/1725/08/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

Students
Project management
Byproducts
Engineers

Keywords

  • Design Structure Matrices
  • Formula Student
  • Engineering Design
  • Graph Theory
  • Change Propogation
  • Engineering Dependencies

Cite this

Gopsill, J., Hicks, B., Snider, C., Joel-Edgar, S., & Emanuel, L. (2017). Automatic Design Structure Matrices: A Comparison of Two Formula Student Projects. Paper presented at 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, Vancouver, Canada.

Automatic Design Structure Matrices : A Comparison of Two Formula Student Projects. / Gopsill, James; Hicks, Ben; Snider, Christopher; Joel-Edgar, Sian; Emanuel, Lia.

2017. Paper presented at 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, Vancouver, Canada.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Gopsill, J, Hicks, B, Snider, C, Joel-Edgar, S & Emanuel, L 2017, 'Automatic Design Structure Matrices: A Comparison of Two Formula Student Projects' Paper presented at 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, Vancouver, Canada, 21/08/17 - 25/08/17, .
Gopsill J, Hicks B, Snider C, Joel-Edgar S, Emanuel L. Automatic Design Structure Matrices: A Comparison of Two Formula Student Projects. 2017. Paper presented at 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, Vancouver, Canada.
Gopsill, James ; Hicks, Ben ; Snider, Christopher ; Joel-Edgar, Sian ; Emanuel, Lia. / Automatic Design Structure Matrices : A Comparison of Two Formula Student Projects. Paper presented at 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, Vancouver, Canada.10 p.
@conference{29d3e05b315e403bb7055fe32df06e66,
title = "Automatic Design Structure Matrices: A Comparison of Two Formula Student Projects",
abstract = "Design Structure Matrices have become a fundamental tool to support engineers in their handling and management of interactions across product & organisational architectures. Recent work in the field has exploited the opportunity afforded by Product Lifecycle Management systems, which capture the digital footprint of engineering projects to generate Design Structure Matrices in real-time through the co-occurrence of edits to product models. Given the systematic and more objective nature of the generation of these DSMs as well as being able to monitor their evolution throughout engineering projects, there now lies an opportunity in comparing projects/products using DSMs.To investigate this and the potential insights that could be generated, this paper presents the automatic generation of DSMs for two Formula Student projects. These have then been compared with respect to the end-of-project, change propagation characteristics and evolution of the DSMs. From this analysis, six insights have been generated that map the characteristics of the DSMs to the performance of the project/product and highlights the potential of automatic DSMs to further support engineering project management.",
keywords = "Design Structure Matrices, Formula Student, Engineering Design, Graph Theory, Change Propogation, Engineering Dependencies",
author = "James Gopsill and Ben Hicks and Christopher Snider and Sian Joel-Edgar and Lia Emanuel",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "25",
language = "English",
note = "21st International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED17 ; Conference date: 21-08-2017 Through 25-08-2017",
url = "http://iced17.org/",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Automatic Design Structure Matrices

T2 - A Comparison of Two Formula Student Projects

AU - Gopsill, James

AU - Hicks, Ben

AU - Snider, Christopher

AU - Joel-Edgar, Sian

AU - Emanuel, Lia

PY - 2017/8/25

Y1 - 2017/8/25

N2 - Design Structure Matrices have become a fundamental tool to support engineers in their handling and management of interactions across product & organisational architectures. Recent work in the field has exploited the opportunity afforded by Product Lifecycle Management systems, which capture the digital footprint of engineering projects to generate Design Structure Matrices in real-time through the co-occurrence of edits to product models. Given the systematic and more objective nature of the generation of these DSMs as well as being able to monitor their evolution throughout engineering projects, there now lies an opportunity in comparing projects/products using DSMs.To investigate this and the potential insights that could be generated, this paper presents the automatic generation of DSMs for two Formula Student projects. These have then been compared with respect to the end-of-project, change propagation characteristics and evolution of the DSMs. From this analysis, six insights have been generated that map the characteristics of the DSMs to the performance of the project/product and highlights the potential of automatic DSMs to further support engineering project management.

AB - Design Structure Matrices have become a fundamental tool to support engineers in their handling and management of interactions across product & organisational architectures. Recent work in the field has exploited the opportunity afforded by Product Lifecycle Management systems, which capture the digital footprint of engineering projects to generate Design Structure Matrices in real-time through the co-occurrence of edits to product models. Given the systematic and more objective nature of the generation of these DSMs as well as being able to monitor their evolution throughout engineering projects, there now lies an opportunity in comparing projects/products using DSMs.To investigate this and the potential insights that could be generated, this paper presents the automatic generation of DSMs for two Formula Student projects. These have then been compared with respect to the end-of-project, change propagation characteristics and evolution of the DSMs. From this analysis, six insights have been generated that map the characteristics of the DSMs to the performance of the project/product and highlights the potential of automatic DSMs to further support engineering project management.

KW - Design Structure Matrices

KW - Formula Student

KW - Engineering Design

KW - Graph Theory

KW - Change Propogation

KW - Engineering Dependencies

M3 - Paper

ER -