Abstract
related pressures within the university; and point at the relevance of the specific organisational context for understanding differing patterns of their institutional work.
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Studies in Higher Education |
| Early online date | 12 Feb 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Status | E-pub ahead of print - 12 Feb 2018 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
Audit-market Intermediaries : Doing Institutional Work in British Research Intensive Universities. / Enders, Jurgen; Naidoo, Rajani.
In: Studies in Higher Education, 12.02.2018.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Audit-market Intermediaries
T2 - Studies in Higher Education
AU - Enders, Jurgen
AU - Naidoo, Rajani
PY - 2018/2/12
Y1 - 2018/2/12
N2 - Our paper examines the rise of a new category of professional support staff whom we refer to as ‘audit-market intermediaries’ in the context of a rapidly changing regulatory and funding environment in British higher education. We explore the roles they play in articulating environmental changes in research intensive universities related to the auditing of teaching via demands for quality assurance and the marketisation of higher education via the rise of the student as a fee paying consumer. The qualitative data reveals the internal and external sources of legitimacy and power of the audit-market intermediaries as well their contestation. We show how these actors serve as mediators of audit and market forces undertaking institutional work by translating, amplifying or bufferingrelated pressures within the university; and point at the relevance of the specific organisational context for understanding differing patterns of their institutional work.
AB - Our paper examines the rise of a new category of professional support staff whom we refer to as ‘audit-market intermediaries’ in the context of a rapidly changing regulatory and funding environment in British higher education. We explore the roles they play in articulating environmental changes in research intensive universities related to the auditing of teaching via demands for quality assurance and the marketisation of higher education via the rise of the student as a fee paying consumer. The qualitative data reveals the internal and external sources of legitimacy and power of the audit-market intermediaries as well their contestation. We show how these actors serve as mediators of audit and market forces undertaking institutional work by translating, amplifying or bufferingrelated pressures within the university; and point at the relevance of the specific organisational context for understanding differing patterns of their institutional work.
U2 - 10.1080/03075079.2018.1436536
DO - 10.1080/03075079.2018.1436536
M3 - Article
JO - Studies in Higher Education
JF - Studies in Higher Education
SN - 0307-5079
ER -