Attentional control and the self: The Self-Attention Network (SAN)

Glyn W. Humphreys, Jie Sui

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although there is strong evidence that human decision-making is frequently self-biased, it remains unclear whether self-biases mediate attention. Here we review evidence on the relations between self-bias effects in decision-making and attention. We ask: Does self-related information capture attention? Do self-biases modulate pre-attentive processes or do they depend on attentional resources being available? We review work on (1) own-name effects, (2) own-face effects, and (3) self-biases in associative matching. We argue that self-related information does have a differential impact on the allocation of attention and that it can alter the saliency of a stimulus in a manner that mimics the effects of perceptual-saliency. However, there is also evidence that self-biases depend on the availability of attentional resources and attentional expectancies for upcoming stimuli. We propose a new processing framework, the Self-Attention Network (SAN), in which neural circuits responding to self-related stimuli interact with circuits supporting attentional control, to determine our emergent behavior. We also discuss how these-bias effects may extend beyond the self to be modulated by the broader social context—for example, by cultural experience, by an in-group as opposed to an out-group stimulus, and by whether we are engaged in joint actions. Self-biases on attention are modulated by social context.

LanguageEnglish
Pages5-17
Number of pages13
JournalCognitive Neuroscience
Volume7
Issue number1-4
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Names
Self-Control

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Own-face effect
  • Own-name effect
  • Self-bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Attentional control and the self : The Self-Attention Network (SAN). / Humphreys, Glyn W.; Sui, Jie.

In: Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 7, No. 1-4, 01.10.2016, p. 5-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{f1a12980fbbe4cfd8665578e95ebfff9,
title = "Attentional control and the self: The Self-Attention Network (SAN)",
abstract = "Although there is strong evidence that human decision-making is frequently self-biased, it remains unclear whether self-biases mediate attention. Here we review evidence on the relations between self-bias effects in decision-making and attention. We ask: Does self-related information capture attention? Do self-biases modulate pre-attentive processes or do they depend on attentional resources being available? We review work on (1) own-name effects, (2) own-face effects, and (3) self-biases in associative matching. We argue that self-related information does have a differential impact on the allocation of attention and that it can alter the saliency of a stimulus in a manner that mimics the effects of perceptual-saliency. However, there is also evidence that self-biases depend on the availability of attentional resources and attentional expectancies for upcoming stimuli. We propose a new processing framework, the Self-Attention Network (SAN), in which neural circuits responding to self-related stimuli interact with circuits supporting attentional control, to determine our emergent behavior. We also discuss how these-bias effects may extend beyond the self to be modulated by the broader social context—for example, by cultural experience, by an in-group as opposed to an out-group stimulus, and by whether we are engaged in joint actions. Self-biases on attention are modulated by social context.",
keywords = "Attention, Own-face effect, Own-name effect, Self-bias",
author = "Humphreys, {Glyn W.} and Jie Sui",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/17588928.2015.1044427",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "5--17",
journal = "Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "1758-8928",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "1-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attentional control and the self

T2 - Cognitive Neuroscience

AU - Humphreys, Glyn W.

AU - Sui, Jie

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Although there is strong evidence that human decision-making is frequently self-biased, it remains unclear whether self-biases mediate attention. Here we review evidence on the relations between self-bias effects in decision-making and attention. We ask: Does self-related information capture attention? Do self-biases modulate pre-attentive processes or do they depend on attentional resources being available? We review work on (1) own-name effects, (2) own-face effects, and (3) self-biases in associative matching. We argue that self-related information does have a differential impact on the allocation of attention and that it can alter the saliency of a stimulus in a manner that mimics the effects of perceptual-saliency. However, there is also evidence that self-biases depend on the availability of attentional resources and attentional expectancies for upcoming stimuli. We propose a new processing framework, the Self-Attention Network (SAN), in which neural circuits responding to self-related stimuli interact with circuits supporting attentional control, to determine our emergent behavior. We also discuss how these-bias effects may extend beyond the self to be modulated by the broader social context—for example, by cultural experience, by an in-group as opposed to an out-group stimulus, and by whether we are engaged in joint actions. Self-biases on attention are modulated by social context.

AB - Although there is strong evidence that human decision-making is frequently self-biased, it remains unclear whether self-biases mediate attention. Here we review evidence on the relations between self-bias effects in decision-making and attention. We ask: Does self-related information capture attention? Do self-biases modulate pre-attentive processes or do they depend on attentional resources being available? We review work on (1) own-name effects, (2) own-face effects, and (3) self-biases in associative matching. We argue that self-related information does have a differential impact on the allocation of attention and that it can alter the saliency of a stimulus in a manner that mimics the effects of perceptual-saliency. However, there is also evidence that self-biases depend on the availability of attentional resources and attentional expectancies for upcoming stimuli. We propose a new processing framework, the Self-Attention Network (SAN), in which neural circuits responding to self-related stimuli interact with circuits supporting attentional control, to determine our emergent behavior. We also discuss how these-bias effects may extend beyond the self to be modulated by the broader social context—for example, by cultural experience, by an in-group as opposed to an out-group stimulus, and by whether we are engaged in joint actions. Self-biases on attention are modulated by social context.

KW - Attention

KW - Own-face effect

KW - Own-name effect

KW - Self-bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929590312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/ShowEdit 10.1080/17588928.2015.1044427

U2 - 10.1080/17588928.2015.1044427

DO - 10.1080/17588928.2015.1044427

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 7

SP - 5

EP - 17

JO - Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 1758-8928

IS - 1-4

ER -