Athletes’ Beliefs about Whistleblowing Doping Misconduct from Six European Countries: A Social Cognitive Perspective

Garafallia Daroglou, Vassilis Barkoukis, Lukas R. W. Fairs, John Toner, Luke Jones, John L. Perry, Andrei V. Micle, Nikolaos C. Theodorou, Sabina Shakhverdieva, Marius Stoicescu, Constantin Pompiliu-Nicolae, Milica V. Vesic, Nenad Dikic, Marija Andjelkovic, Jesus Munoz-Guerra Revilla, Elena Garcia Grimau, Miguel A. Martinez, Javier Argaya Amigo, Anne Schomoller, Adam R. Nicholls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background
Doping in sports is a worldwide problem which affects the integrity of sports and can endanger the physical and psychological health of athletes. Whistleblowing represents a method for detecting doping offences that may otherwise have gone undetected, but our understanding of whistleblowing against doping offences is limited. The purpose of this paper was to identify whether personal and social psychological variables were associated with intentions to report doping in sport.
Method
1146 active athletes aged ≥15 years, regularly training and participating in competitions participated to the study. Athletes were informed about study aims and gave informed consent. The sample completed measures related to organizational support, protection and costs of whistleblowing behaviours, justice/legitimacy, personal responsibility, group identification, similarity/favourability, personal benefits, perceived behavioral control, attitudes, and intentions. Internal consistency across multi-item scales was good to excellent (ω range 0.78–.96). Data were analysed using structural equation modeling.
Results
There were significant relationships between intentions and among perceived costs, benefits, personal factors, and organizational structures. The structural model fit was acceptable (CFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.03) and showed that personal responsibility, group identification, and role-model favorability/similarity positively predicted perceived benefits, whereas organizational support/protection negatively predicted perceived costs. In turn, perceived benefits were associated with more positive attitudes and greater perceived behavioral control, which was the strongest direct predictor of whistleblowing intentions.
Conclusions
The findings underscore the complex interplay between personal and organizational factors in shaping attitudes and perceived behavioral control toward whistleblowing, ultimately influencing intentions.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100181
JournalEmerging Trends in Drugs, Addictions, and Health
Volume5
Early online date11 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Oct 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025

Funding

This article was funded by the European Commission's Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency [Unit A.6, Erasmus +: Sport, Youth and EU Aid Volunteers]. Project title: Understanding and promoting whistleblowing on doping irregularities in the EU (Win-Dop). Project reference number: 612968-EPP-1–2019–1-UK-SPO-SCP

FundersFunder number
Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency
European Commission612968-EPP-1–2019–1-UK-SPO-SCP

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Doping
  • Intentions
  • Performance enhancing drugs
  • Whistleblowing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Pharmacology
  • Drug Discovery
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Athletes’ Beliefs about Whistleblowing Doping Misconduct from Six European Countries: A Social Cognitive Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this