Associations between self-reported injury history, physical complaints, and medical attention injury during Army basic military training

Neil Gibson, Jace Drain, Matthew Whalan, Sean Williams, Herbert Groeller, John Sampson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Effective and easily implementable methods to reduce the incidence and burden of injury during Army basic military training (BMT) are desirable. This study therefore investigated: (1) the association between prior injury history and medical attention (MA) injury; and (2) the association and accuracy of daily self-reported physical complaints on the incidence of MA injury, during Army BMT.

Materials and methods: Recruits (n = 625, male = 524; female = 101; age: 22 ± 6 years [range: 17–55 years]) completed a 12-month prior injury history questionnaire during week-one and throughout BMT reported physical complaints daily, using a modified Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre Questionnaire on Health Problems (OSTRC-H). MA injuries were recorded via physiotherapy reports. Cox proportional hazard regressions explored the association between prior injury and MA injury. Generalised linear mixed-effects models were used to model the association between OSTRC-H responses and a MA incident injury within 7-days. The predictive ability and accuracy of OSTRC-H responses were also assessed.

Results: Prior injury was not significantly associated with a greater risk of MA injury during BMT. Self-reported physical complaints effecting ‘participation’ (“Full participation, but with injury/illness” odds ratio [OR] = 2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97–2.52; “Reduced participation due to injury/illness”, OR = 3.19, 95% CI 2.54–4.00), ‘severity’ (“To a mild extent” OR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.91–2.51; “To a moderate extent” OR = 2.83, 95% CI 2.38–3.36; “To a severe extent”: OR = 4.50, 95% CI 3.26–6.21) and ‘location’ (OR= 2.19, 95% CI 1.962.45) were significantly associated with greater odds of MA incident injury within 7-days. Spine (OR = 4.39, 95% CI 3.07–6.30), upper- (OR= 2.45, 95% CI 1.76–3.40) and lowerextremity (OR = 2.73, 95% CI 2.40–3.40) physical complaints were significantly associated with a MA incident injury to the corresponding general body region within 7-days. Using the presence of a physical complaint to indicate the occurrence of a MA incident injury within 7 days resulted in a high number of false positives and false negatives (area under the curve (AUC): 0.51–0.66). 

Conclusions: Independently, self-reported 12-month prior injury was not significantly associated with a greater risk of a MA injury during BMT. Daily self-reported physical complaints may however flag increased MA injury risk, which could help prevent more severe injuries.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMilitary Medicine
Early online date19 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 May 2025

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available. Data will only be made available upon formal request to the corresponding author who will seek approval from the relevant agencies.

Acknowledgements

The authors are extremely grateful to both the recruits who participated in the study and the Australian Army personnel at the Army Recruit Training Centre for their support to facilitate this investigation, as without their support this work would not have been possible.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Defence Science and Technology Group via research agreement #7081.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Associations between self-reported injury history, physical complaints, and medical attention injury during Army basic military training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this