Are there species smaller than 1 mm?

Axel G. Rossberg, T Rogers, Alan J McKane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)
82 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The rapid advance in genetic sequencing technologies has provided an unprecedented amount of data on the biodiversity of meiofauna. It was hoped that these data would allow the identification and counting of species, distinguished as tight clusters of similar genomes. Surprisingly, this appears not to be the case. Here, we begin a theoretical discussion of this phenomenon, drawing on an individual-based ecological model to inform our arguments. The determining factor in the emergence (or not) of distinguishable genetic clusters in the model is the product of population size with mutation rate—a measure of the adaptability of the population as a whole. This result suggests that indeed one should not expect to observe clearly distinguishable species groupings in data gathered from ultrasequencing of meiofauna.
Original languageEnglish
Article number20131248
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume280
Issue number1767
Early online date24 Jul 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
Mutation Rate
Population Density
meiofauna
Genome
Technology
Population
genetic improvement
population size
Genes
biodiversity
mutation
genome

Cite this

Are there species smaller than 1 mm? / G. Rossberg, Axel; Rogers, T; McKane, Alan J.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 280, No. 1767, 20131248, 22.09.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

G. Rossberg, Axel ; Rogers, T ; McKane, Alan J. / Are there species smaller than 1 mm?. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2013 ; Vol. 280, No. 1767.
@article{cb1fa533327b4824bf59942f456586bc,
title = "Are there species smaller than 1 mm?",
abstract = "The rapid advance in genetic sequencing technologies has provided an unprecedented amount of data on the biodiversity of meiofauna. It was hoped that these data would allow the identification and counting of species, distinguished as tight clusters of similar genomes. Surprisingly, this appears not to be the case. Here, we begin a theoretical discussion of this phenomenon, drawing on an individual-based ecological model to inform our arguments. The determining factor in the emergence (or not) of distinguishable genetic clusters in the model is the product of population size with mutation rate—a measure of the adaptability of the population as a whole. This result suggests that indeed one should not expect to observe clearly distinguishable species groupings in data gathered from ultrasequencing of meiofauna.",
author = "{G. Rossberg}, Axel and T Rogers and McKane, {Alan J}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1098/rspb.2013.1248",
language = "English",
volume = "280",
journal = "Philosophical transactions B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8436",
publisher = "The Royal Society",
number = "1767",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are there species smaller than 1 mm?

AU - G. Rossberg, Axel

AU - Rogers, T

AU - McKane, Alan J

PY - 2013/9/22

Y1 - 2013/9/22

N2 - The rapid advance in genetic sequencing technologies has provided an unprecedented amount of data on the biodiversity of meiofauna. It was hoped that these data would allow the identification and counting of species, distinguished as tight clusters of similar genomes. Surprisingly, this appears not to be the case. Here, we begin a theoretical discussion of this phenomenon, drawing on an individual-based ecological model to inform our arguments. The determining factor in the emergence (or not) of distinguishable genetic clusters in the model is the product of population size with mutation rate—a measure of the adaptability of the population as a whole. This result suggests that indeed one should not expect to observe clearly distinguishable species groupings in data gathered from ultrasequencing of meiofauna.

AB - The rapid advance in genetic sequencing technologies has provided an unprecedented amount of data on the biodiversity of meiofauna. It was hoped that these data would allow the identification and counting of species, distinguished as tight clusters of similar genomes. Surprisingly, this appears not to be the case. Here, we begin a theoretical discussion of this phenomenon, drawing on an individual-based ecological model to inform our arguments. The determining factor in the emergence (or not) of distinguishable genetic clusters in the model is the product of population size with mutation rate—a measure of the adaptability of the population as a whole. This result suggests that indeed one should not expect to observe clearly distinguishable species groupings in data gathered from ultrasequencing of meiofauna.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880747760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/280/1767/20131248.abstract

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1248

U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2013.1248

DO - 10.1098/rspb.2013.1248

M3 - Article

VL - 280

JO - Philosophical transactions B: Biological Sciences

JF - Philosophical transactions B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8436

IS - 1767

M1 - 20131248

ER -