Abstract
Some retailers offer price match guarantees, whereas others offer guarantees making the same promise but labeling these low-price guarantees. Do consumers respond differently to these different price guarantee labels? To address this research question, this paper leverages insights from pricing, signaling, and regulatory focus theories to demonstrate – across multiple studies – that consumers perceive price match versus low price guarantees differently. In turn, contingent on consumers’ regulatory focus, this difference in perceptions feeds forward and influences consumers’ purchase intentions and post purchase (e.g., repurchase) intentions. This paper contributes to theory, not only by showing differences across price match versus low price guarantees, but also by being the first to jointly examine purchase and post purchase intentions relating to price guarantees. This paper also speaks to practice, noting contingencies that determine whether the price match or the low-price guarantee label should be used.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 99-108 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Retailing |
Volume | 95 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 10 Aug 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2019 |
Keywords
- Low price guarantees
- Price guarantees
- Price match guarantees
- Regulatory focus
- Signaling
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Marketing