Approaches to evidence synthesis in international development: a research agenda

Sandy Oliver, David Gough, James Copestake, James Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article discusses the spectrum of synthesis methods available to generate, explore and text theory, their value to the field of international development and innovations required to make better use of the primary research available. It argues for clearer distinctions between syntheses produced as public goods and those tailored to specific circumstances, and strengthening knowledge systems through greater use of maps to navigate existing and missing evidence, harmonised outcomes and measures, and advances in automation technologies. Improved methods and guidance are required for synthesising formative research and investigating contextual factors. Engaging stakeholders and working across academic disciplines support the production of policy-relevant syntheses and inspire methods development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-326
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Development Effectiveness
Volume10
Issue number3
Early online date11 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

evidence
value theory
automation
stakeholder
innovation
knowledge
method
policy

Keywords

  • CEDIL
  • Evidence
  • research agenda
  • synthesis
  • systematic reviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development

Cite this

Approaches to evidence synthesis in international development: a research agenda. / Oliver, Sandy; Gough, David; Copestake, James; Thomas, James.

In: Journal of Development Effectiveness, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2018, p. 305-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oliver, Sandy ; Gough, David ; Copestake, James ; Thomas, James. / Approaches to evidence synthesis in international development: a research agenda. In: Journal of Development Effectiveness. 2018 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 305-326.
@article{74293a59fc43467698bd5548308a9f8f,
title = "Approaches to evidence synthesis in international development: a research agenda",
abstract = "This article discusses the spectrum of synthesis methods available to generate, explore and text theory, their value to the field of international development and innovations required to make better use of the primary research available. It argues for clearer distinctions between syntheses produced as public goods and those tailored to specific circumstances, and strengthening knowledge systems through greater use of maps to navigate existing and missing evidence, harmonised outcomes and measures, and advances in automation technologies. Improved methods and guidance are required for synthesising formative research and investigating contextual factors. Engaging stakeholders and working across academic disciplines support the production of policy-relevant syntheses and inspire methods development.",
keywords = "CEDIL, Evidence, research agenda, synthesis, systematic reviews",
author = "Sandy Oliver and David Gough and James Copestake and James Thomas",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/19439342.2018.1478875",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "305--326",
journal = "Journal of Development Effectiveness",
issn = "1943-9342",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approaches to evidence synthesis in international development: a research agenda

AU - Oliver, Sandy

AU - Gough, David

AU - Copestake, James

AU - Thomas, James

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article discusses the spectrum of synthesis methods available to generate, explore and text theory, their value to the field of international development and innovations required to make better use of the primary research available. It argues for clearer distinctions between syntheses produced as public goods and those tailored to specific circumstances, and strengthening knowledge systems through greater use of maps to navigate existing and missing evidence, harmonised outcomes and measures, and advances in automation technologies. Improved methods and guidance are required for synthesising formative research and investigating contextual factors. Engaging stakeholders and working across academic disciplines support the production of policy-relevant syntheses and inspire methods development.

AB - This article discusses the spectrum of synthesis methods available to generate, explore and text theory, their value to the field of international development and innovations required to make better use of the primary research available. It argues for clearer distinctions between syntheses produced as public goods and those tailored to specific circumstances, and strengthening knowledge systems through greater use of maps to navigate existing and missing evidence, harmonised outcomes and measures, and advances in automation technologies. Improved methods and guidance are required for synthesising formative research and investigating contextual factors. Engaging stakeholders and working across academic disciplines support the production of policy-relevant syntheses and inspire methods development.

KW - CEDIL

KW - Evidence

KW - research agenda

KW - synthesis

KW - systematic reviews

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049960905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19439342.2018.1478875

DO - 10.1080/19439342.2018.1478875

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 305

EP - 326

JO - Journal of Development Effectiveness

JF - Journal of Development Effectiveness

SN - 1943-9342

IS - 3

ER -