Abstract
This article discusses the spectrum of synthesis methods available to generate, explore and text theory, their value to the field of international development and innovations required to make better use of the primary research available. It argues for clearer distinctions between syntheses produced as public goods and those tailored to specific circumstances, and strengthening knowledge systems through greater use of maps to navigate existing and missing evidence, harmonised outcomes and measures, and advances in automation technologies. Improved methods and guidance are required for synthesising formative research and investigating contextual factors. Engaging stakeholders and working across academic disciplines support the production of policy-relevant syntheses and inspire methods development.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 305-326 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Journal of Development Effectiveness |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 11 Jul 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- CEDIL
- Evidence
- research agenda
- synthesis
- systematic reviews
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Development