Applied and academic A levels: is there really a need for the applied track in UK further education?

Stephen Wilkins, Ian Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
78 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The term ‘applied track’ in UK further education has been used to refer to the applied A level, the vocational, coursework-based version of the traditional academic A level. Vocational and coursework-based courses are often criticised for being easier than academic courses, for only attracting students who do not satisfy the requirements to take academic courses and for not developing in students the skills they need to be successful in higher education. This paper considers the extent to which these criticisms may be justified and explores the reasons why students chose to take an applied A level. The study involved 666 students at a large, mixed sex sixth form college in the UK, who were taking both applied and academic A levels. Although statistical analysis showed that students on the applied course performed worse than students on two academic courses once their different GCSE scores had been accounted for, it was also found that the applied students were relatively well qualified, that they were generally well motivated and hard working, and that they were extremely satisfied with the course. Finally, it is suggested that perhaps universities are misguided in assuming that applied courses do not develop in students the skills that they need to be successful in higher education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)461-482
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Further and Higher Education
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

further education
student
statistical analysis
education
criticism
university

Cite this

Applied and academic A levels: is there really a need for the applied track in UK further education? / Wilkins, Stephen; Walker, Ian.

In: Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2011, p. 461-482.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef781428b3074829ab82878b78353d27,
title = "Applied and academic A levels: is there really a need for the applied track in UK further education?",
abstract = "The term ‘applied track’ in UK further education has been used to refer to the applied A level, the vocational, coursework-based version of the traditional academic A level. Vocational and coursework-based courses are often criticised for being easier than academic courses, for only attracting students who do not satisfy the requirements to take academic courses and for not developing in students the skills they need to be successful in higher education. This paper considers the extent to which these criticisms may be justified and explores the reasons why students chose to take an applied A level. The study involved 666 students at a large, mixed sex sixth form college in the UK, who were taking both applied and academic A levels. Although statistical analysis showed that students on the applied course performed worse than students on two academic courses once their different GCSE scores had been accounted for, it was also found that the applied students were relatively well qualified, that they were generally well motivated and hard working, and that they were extremely satisfied with the course. Finally, it is suggested that perhaps universities are misguided in assuming that applied courses do not develop in students the skills that they need to be successful in higher education.",
author = "Stephen Wilkins and Ian Walker",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/0309877X.2011.584967",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "461--482",
journal = "Journal of Further and Higher Education",
issn = "0309-877X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applied and academic A levels: is there really a need for the applied track in UK further education?

AU - Wilkins, Stephen

AU - Walker, Ian

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The term ‘applied track’ in UK further education has been used to refer to the applied A level, the vocational, coursework-based version of the traditional academic A level. Vocational and coursework-based courses are often criticised for being easier than academic courses, for only attracting students who do not satisfy the requirements to take academic courses and for not developing in students the skills they need to be successful in higher education. This paper considers the extent to which these criticisms may be justified and explores the reasons why students chose to take an applied A level. The study involved 666 students at a large, mixed sex sixth form college in the UK, who were taking both applied and academic A levels. Although statistical analysis showed that students on the applied course performed worse than students on two academic courses once their different GCSE scores had been accounted for, it was also found that the applied students were relatively well qualified, that they were generally well motivated and hard working, and that they were extremely satisfied with the course. Finally, it is suggested that perhaps universities are misguided in assuming that applied courses do not develop in students the skills that they need to be successful in higher education.

AB - The term ‘applied track’ in UK further education has been used to refer to the applied A level, the vocational, coursework-based version of the traditional academic A level. Vocational and coursework-based courses are often criticised for being easier than academic courses, for only attracting students who do not satisfy the requirements to take academic courses and for not developing in students the skills they need to be successful in higher education. This paper considers the extent to which these criticisms may be justified and explores the reasons why students chose to take an applied A level. The study involved 666 students at a large, mixed sex sixth form college in the UK, who were taking both applied and academic A levels. Although statistical analysis showed that students on the applied course performed worse than students on two academic courses once their different GCSE scores had been accounted for, it was also found that the applied students were relatively well qualified, that they were generally well motivated and hard working, and that they were extremely satisfied with the course. Finally, it is suggested that perhaps universities are misguided in assuming that applied courses do not develop in students the skills that they need to be successful in higher education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858606227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.584967

U2 - 10.1080/0309877X.2011.584967

DO - 10.1080/0309877X.2011.584967

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 461

EP - 482

JO - Journal of Further and Higher Education

JF - Journal of Further and Higher Education

SN - 0309-877X

IS - 4

ER -