Applicants’ likelihood to apply for jobs at professional service firms: the role of different career mechanisms

Nina Hansen, Oliver Schnittka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Against the backdrop of only a few empirical studies on the topic of up-or-out career models in Professional Service Firms, we highlight the importance of an explicit applicant perspective on the topic of up-or-out and develop a quantitative approach to analyze the perception and effects of up-or-out models in practice. Our empirical study is based on an online practitioner survey as well as on a two-by-two between-subjects-experiment with law and management students. The practitioner sample shows that the interviewed classic PSFs (law firms and accounting firms) have predominantly implemented alternative career positions in favor of up-or-out models while the interviewed Neo-PSFs (consulting firms) show a more balanced implementation of up-or-out models and extended career models. However, results of our experimental applicant study reveal that the potential employee groups have different preferences: Law students (and hence potential applicants of classic PSFs in the future) show a higher likelihood to apply in connection with the up-or-outmodel, whereas management students (and hence potential applicants of Neo-PSFs in the future) show a higher likelihood to apply in connection with the alternative career model.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-46
Number of pages46
JournalHuman Resource Management
Early online date7 Dec 2017
DOIs
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Students
Professional service firms
Personnel
Experiments
Surveys and Questionnaires
Empirical study

Keywords

  • applicants’ perceptions
  • career models
  • job advertisements
  • likelihood to apply
  • professional service firms
  • up-or-out model

Cite this

Applicants’ likelihood to apply for jobs at professional service firms: the role of different career mechanisms. / Hansen, Nina; Schnittka, Oliver.

In: Human Resource Management, 07.12.2017, p. 1-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c1bd7901e9e743b89522a430d9404f21,
title = "Applicants’ likelihood to apply for jobs at professional service firms: the role of different career mechanisms",
abstract = "Against the backdrop of only a few empirical studies on the topic of up-or-out career models in Professional Service Firms, we highlight the importance of an explicit applicant perspective on the topic of up-or-out and develop a quantitative approach to analyze the perception and effects of up-or-out models in practice. Our empirical study is based on an online practitioner survey as well as on a two-by-two between-subjects-experiment with law and management students. The practitioner sample shows that the interviewed classic PSFs (law firms and accounting firms) have predominantly implemented alternative career positions in favor of up-or-out models while the interviewed Neo-PSFs (consulting firms) show a more balanced implementation of up-or-out models and extended career models. However, results of our experimental applicant study reveal that the potential employee groups have different preferences: Law students (and hence potential applicants of classic PSFs in the future) show a higher likelihood to apply in connection with the up-or-outmodel, whereas management students (and hence potential applicants of Neo-PSFs in the future) show a higher likelihood to apply in connection with the alternative career model.",
keywords = "applicants’ perceptions, career models, job advertisements, likelihood to apply, professional service firms, up-or-out model",
author = "Nina Hansen and Oliver Schnittka",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1002/hrm.21878",
language = "English",
pages = "1--46",
journal = "Human Resource Management",
issn = "0090-4848",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applicants’ likelihood to apply for jobs at professional service firms: the role of different career mechanisms

AU - Hansen,Nina

AU - Schnittka,Oliver

PY - 2017/12/7

Y1 - 2017/12/7

N2 - Against the backdrop of only a few empirical studies on the topic of up-or-out career models in Professional Service Firms, we highlight the importance of an explicit applicant perspective on the topic of up-or-out and develop a quantitative approach to analyze the perception and effects of up-or-out models in practice. Our empirical study is based on an online practitioner survey as well as on a two-by-two between-subjects-experiment with law and management students. The practitioner sample shows that the interviewed classic PSFs (law firms and accounting firms) have predominantly implemented alternative career positions in favor of up-or-out models while the interviewed Neo-PSFs (consulting firms) show a more balanced implementation of up-or-out models and extended career models. However, results of our experimental applicant study reveal that the potential employee groups have different preferences: Law students (and hence potential applicants of classic PSFs in the future) show a higher likelihood to apply in connection with the up-or-outmodel, whereas management students (and hence potential applicants of Neo-PSFs in the future) show a higher likelihood to apply in connection with the alternative career model.

AB - Against the backdrop of only a few empirical studies on the topic of up-or-out career models in Professional Service Firms, we highlight the importance of an explicit applicant perspective on the topic of up-or-out and develop a quantitative approach to analyze the perception and effects of up-or-out models in practice. Our empirical study is based on an online practitioner survey as well as on a two-by-two between-subjects-experiment with law and management students. The practitioner sample shows that the interviewed classic PSFs (law firms and accounting firms) have predominantly implemented alternative career positions in favor of up-or-out models while the interviewed Neo-PSFs (consulting firms) show a more balanced implementation of up-or-out models and extended career models. However, results of our experimental applicant study reveal that the potential employee groups have different preferences: Law students (and hence potential applicants of classic PSFs in the future) show a higher likelihood to apply in connection with the up-or-outmodel, whereas management students (and hence potential applicants of Neo-PSFs in the future) show a higher likelihood to apply in connection with the alternative career model.

KW - applicants’ perceptions

KW - career models

KW - job advertisements

KW - likelihood to apply

KW - professional service firms

KW - up-or-out model

U2 - 10.1002/hrm.21878

DO - 10.1002/hrm.21878

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 46

JO - Human Resource Management

T2 - Human Resource Management

JF - Human Resource Management

SN - 0090-4848

ER -