Anti-trust and the ‘Beckerian Proposition’: the Effects of Investigation and Fines on Cartels

Subhasish M. Chowdhury, Frederick Wandschneider

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To deter and punish illegal collusions antitrust authorities run costly investigations and levy fines on detected and convicted wrongdoers. According to Becker (1968) the magnitude of fines and the detection rates are substitutable in their deterrence effect. We investigate this proposition through a market experiment, and study the effects of different fine and detection rate combinations (with constant expected fines) on cartel activity, prices and cartel stability. Our results show that in the absence of a leniency program, complying with the Beckerian Proposition, detection rates and fines are indeed substitutable in deterring cartels. With a leniency program, however, due to behavioral bias a regime that embodies low detection rate and high fine lowers the overall incidence of cartelization. The market price in this regime is also significantly lower than in a high detection rate low fine regime. Finally, irrespective of the presence of a leniency program, the different detection rate – fine combinations do not affect the cartel stability. These findings indicate that antitrust agencies can rely on behavioral biases to economize on enforcement costs and achieve a higher degree of deterrence by reducing investigative efforts and increasing the fine level.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Behavioral Industrial Organization
EditorsVictor Tremblay, Elizabeth Schroeder, Carol Tremblay
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd
Pages368-403
Number of pages36
ISBN (Electronic)ISBN 978 1 78471 898 5
ISBN (Print)ISBN 978 1 78471 897 8
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2018

Fingerprint

Costs
Experiments

Cite this

Chowdhury, S. M., & Wandschneider, F. (2018). Anti-trust and the ‘Beckerian Proposition’: the Effects of Investigation and Fines on Cartels. In V. Tremblay, E. Schroeder, & C. Tremblay (Eds.), Handbook of Behavioral Industrial Organization (pp. 368-403). [14] Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

Anti-trust and the ‘Beckerian Proposition’: the Effects of Investigation and Fines on Cartels. / Chowdhury, Subhasish M.; Wandschneider, Frederick.

Handbook of Behavioral Industrial Organization. ed. / Victor Tremblay; Elizabeth Schroeder; Carol Tremblay. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2018. p. 368-403 14.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Chowdhury, SM & Wandschneider, F 2018, Anti-trust and the ‘Beckerian Proposition’: the Effects of Investigation and Fines on Cartels. in V Tremblay, E Schroeder & C Tremblay (eds), Handbook of Behavioral Industrial Organization., 14, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp. 368-403.
Chowdhury SM, Wandschneider F. Anti-trust and the ‘Beckerian Proposition’: the Effects of Investigation and Fines on Cartels. In Tremblay V, Schroeder E, Tremblay C, editors, Handbook of Behavioral Industrial Organization. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2018. p. 368-403. 14
Chowdhury, Subhasish M. ; Wandschneider, Frederick. / Anti-trust and the ‘Beckerian Proposition’: the Effects of Investigation and Fines on Cartels. Handbook of Behavioral Industrial Organization. editor / Victor Tremblay ; Elizabeth Schroeder ; Carol Tremblay. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2018. pp. 368-403
@inbook{a22a92a966044184a9429a58695430e6,
title = "Anti-trust and the ‘Beckerian Proposition’: the Effects of Investigation and Fines on Cartels",
abstract = "To deter and punish illegal collusions antitrust authorities run costly investigations and levy fines on detected and convicted wrongdoers. According to Becker (1968) the magnitude of fines and the detection rates are substitutable in their deterrence effect. We investigate this proposition through a market experiment, and study the effects of different fine and detection rate combinations (with constant expected fines) on cartel activity, prices and cartel stability. Our results show that in the absence of a leniency program, complying with the Beckerian Proposition, detection rates and fines are indeed substitutable in deterring cartels. With a leniency program, however, due to behavioral bias a regime that embodies low detection rate and high fine lowers the overall incidence of cartelization. The market price in this regime is also significantly lower than in a high detection rate low fine regime. Finally, irrespective of the presence of a leniency program, the different detection rate – fine combinations do not affect the cartel stability. These findings indicate that antitrust agencies can rely on behavioral biases to economize on enforcement costs and achieve a higher degree of deterrence by reducing investigative efforts and increasing the fine level.",
author = "Chowdhury, {Subhasish M.} and Frederick Wandschneider",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "22",
language = "English",
isbn = "ISBN 978 1 78471 897 8",
pages = "368--403",
editor = "Victor Tremblay and Elizabeth Schroeder and Carol Tremblay",
booktitle = "Handbook of Behavioral Industrial Organization",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd",
address = "UK United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Anti-trust and the ‘Beckerian Proposition’: the Effects of Investigation and Fines on Cartels

AU - Chowdhury, Subhasish M.

AU - Wandschneider, Frederick

PY - 2018/5/22

Y1 - 2018/5/22

N2 - To deter and punish illegal collusions antitrust authorities run costly investigations and levy fines on detected and convicted wrongdoers. According to Becker (1968) the magnitude of fines and the detection rates are substitutable in their deterrence effect. We investigate this proposition through a market experiment, and study the effects of different fine and detection rate combinations (with constant expected fines) on cartel activity, prices and cartel stability. Our results show that in the absence of a leniency program, complying with the Beckerian Proposition, detection rates and fines are indeed substitutable in deterring cartels. With a leniency program, however, due to behavioral bias a regime that embodies low detection rate and high fine lowers the overall incidence of cartelization. The market price in this regime is also significantly lower than in a high detection rate low fine regime. Finally, irrespective of the presence of a leniency program, the different detection rate – fine combinations do not affect the cartel stability. These findings indicate that antitrust agencies can rely on behavioral biases to economize on enforcement costs and achieve a higher degree of deterrence by reducing investigative efforts and increasing the fine level.

AB - To deter and punish illegal collusions antitrust authorities run costly investigations and levy fines on detected and convicted wrongdoers. According to Becker (1968) the magnitude of fines and the detection rates are substitutable in their deterrence effect. We investigate this proposition through a market experiment, and study the effects of different fine and detection rate combinations (with constant expected fines) on cartel activity, prices and cartel stability. Our results show that in the absence of a leniency program, complying with the Beckerian Proposition, detection rates and fines are indeed substitutable in deterring cartels. With a leniency program, however, due to behavioral bias a regime that embodies low detection rate and high fine lowers the overall incidence of cartelization. The market price in this regime is also significantly lower than in a high detection rate low fine regime. Finally, irrespective of the presence of a leniency program, the different detection rate – fine combinations do not affect the cartel stability. These findings indicate that antitrust agencies can rely on behavioral biases to economize on enforcement costs and achieve a higher degree of deterrence by reducing investigative efforts and increasing the fine level.

M3 - Chapter

SN - ISBN 978 1 78471 897 8

SP - 368

EP - 403

BT - Handbook of Behavioral Industrial Organization

A2 - Tremblay, Victor

A2 - Schroeder, Elizabeth

A2 - Tremblay, Carol

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd

ER -