Anthropologists Working "at Home": On the Range of Subjects and Forms of Representation in Film, and What Makes These Ethnographic

Oliver Picton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This discussion explores the meaning of ethnographic film with reference to films made by filmmakers "at home." It is argued that ethnographicness in film is best conceptualized as a continuum, and that anthropology must embrace transnationalism and the changing nature of "homes" and "abroads" in order to present and represent peoples' voices in an era of increasing globalization. It is argued that the way that ethnographic film evolves, as a cultural product and process itself, should be embraced and celebrated for its ability to recognize universal humanity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)421-436
Number of pages16
JournalVisual Anthropology
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

anthropology
globalization
ability

Cite this

Anthropologists Working "at Home": On the Range of Subjects and Forms of Representation in Film, and What Makes These Ethnographic. / Picton, Oliver.

In: Visual Anthropology, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2011, p. 421-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7e4db2c944124b0fb1cc7345d86ef477,
title = "Anthropologists Working {"}at Home{"}: On the Range of Subjects and Forms of Representation in Film, and What Makes These Ethnographic",
abstract = "This discussion explores the meaning of ethnographic film with reference to films made by filmmakers {"}at home.{"} It is argued that ethnographicness in film is best conceptualized as a continuum, and that anthropology must embrace transnationalism and the changing nature of {"}homes{"} and {"}abroads{"} in order to present and represent peoples' voices in an era of increasing globalization. It is argued that the way that ethnographic film evolves, as a cultural product and process itself, should be embraced and celebrated for its ability to recognize universal humanity.",
author = "Oliver Picton",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/08949468.2011.604596",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "421--436",
journal = "Visual Anthropology",
issn = "0894-9468",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anthropologists Working "at Home": On the Range of Subjects and Forms of Representation in Film, and What Makes These Ethnographic

AU - Picton, Oliver

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This discussion explores the meaning of ethnographic film with reference to films made by filmmakers "at home." It is argued that ethnographicness in film is best conceptualized as a continuum, and that anthropology must embrace transnationalism and the changing nature of "homes" and "abroads" in order to present and represent peoples' voices in an era of increasing globalization. It is argued that the way that ethnographic film evolves, as a cultural product and process itself, should be embraced and celebrated for its ability to recognize universal humanity.

AB - This discussion explores the meaning of ethnographic film with reference to films made by filmmakers "at home." It is argued that ethnographicness in film is best conceptualized as a continuum, and that anthropology must embrace transnationalism and the changing nature of "homes" and "abroads" in order to present and represent peoples' voices in an era of increasing globalization. It is argued that the way that ethnographic film evolves, as a cultural product and process itself, should be embraced and celebrated for its ability to recognize universal humanity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858777794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2011.604596

U2 - 10.1080/08949468.2011.604596

DO - 10.1080/08949468.2011.604596

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 421

EP - 436

JO - Visual Anthropology

JF - Visual Anthropology

SN - 0894-9468

IS - 5

ER -