Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study

Nicola J. Clarke, Martin E. H. Willis, Jemima S. Barnes, Nick Caddick, John Cromby, Hilary Mcdermott, Gareth Wiltshire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent interest in analytical pluralism—the application of more than one qualitative analytical method to a single data set—has demonstrated its potential to produce multiple, complex, and varied understandings of phenomena. However, tensions remain regarding the commensurability of findings produced from diverse theoretical frameworks, the practical application of multiple methods of analysis, and the capacity of pluralism to contribute to knowledge in psychology. This study addresses these issues through a critical interpretation of existing qualitative studies that utilized analytical pluralism. Using a meta-study design, we examined the use of theory, application of methods, and production of findings in studies that had adopted qualitative analytical pluralism. Following comprehensive database searches, ten articles were included in the analysis. Epistemological and ontological considerations, the influence of decisions made in the practical application of pluralism, and approaches to interpreting findings produced from multiple analyses are discussed, and implications for future research are considered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-201
Number of pages20
JournalQualitative Research in Psychology
Volume12
Issue number2
Early online date19 Aug 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Cultural Diversity
Qualitative Research
Databases
Psychology

Cite this

Clarke, N. J., Willis, M. E. H., Barnes, J. S., Caddick, N., Cromby, J., Mcdermott, H., & Wiltshire, G. (2015). Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 182-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.948980

Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study. / Clarke, Nicola J.; Willis, Martin E. H.; Barnes, Jemima S.; Caddick, Nick; Cromby, John; Mcdermott, Hilary; Wiltshire, Gareth.

In: Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2015, p. 182-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Clarke, NJ, Willis, MEH, Barnes, JS, Caddick, N, Cromby, J, Mcdermott, H & Wiltshire, G 2015, 'Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study', Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 182-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.948980
Clarke NJ, Willis MEH, Barnes JS, Caddick N, Cromby J, Mcdermott H et al. Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2015;12(2):182-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.948980
Clarke, Nicola J. ; Willis, Martin E. H. ; Barnes, Jemima S. ; Caddick, Nick ; Cromby, John ; Mcdermott, Hilary ; Wiltshire, Gareth. / Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study. In: Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 182-201.
@article{fda70af9d13a47b59d90ada619391adb,
title = "Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study",
abstract = "Recent interest in analytical pluralism—the application of more than one qualitative analytical method to a single data set—has demonstrated its potential to produce multiple, complex, and varied understandings of phenomena. However, tensions remain regarding the commensurability of findings produced from diverse theoretical frameworks, the practical application of multiple methods of analysis, and the capacity of pluralism to contribute to knowledge in psychology. This study addresses these issues through a critical interpretation of existing qualitative studies that utilized analytical pluralism. Using a meta-study design, we examined the use of theory, application of methods, and production of findings in studies that had adopted qualitative analytical pluralism. Following comprehensive database searches, ten articles were included in the analysis. Epistemological and ontological considerations, the influence of decisions made in the practical application of pluralism, and approaches to interpreting findings produced from multiple analyses are discussed, and implications for future research are considered.",
author = "Clarke, {Nicola J.} and Willis, {Martin E. H.} and Barnes, {Jemima S.} and Nick Caddick and John Cromby and Hilary Mcdermott and Gareth Wiltshire",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/14780887.2014.948980",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "182--201",
journal = "Qualitative Research in Psychology",
issn = "1478-0887",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study

AU - Clarke, Nicola J.

AU - Willis, Martin E. H.

AU - Barnes, Jemima S.

AU - Caddick, Nick

AU - Cromby, John

AU - Mcdermott, Hilary

AU - Wiltshire, Gareth

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Recent interest in analytical pluralism—the application of more than one qualitative analytical method to a single data set—has demonstrated its potential to produce multiple, complex, and varied understandings of phenomena. However, tensions remain regarding the commensurability of findings produced from diverse theoretical frameworks, the practical application of multiple methods of analysis, and the capacity of pluralism to contribute to knowledge in psychology. This study addresses these issues through a critical interpretation of existing qualitative studies that utilized analytical pluralism. Using a meta-study design, we examined the use of theory, application of methods, and production of findings in studies that had adopted qualitative analytical pluralism. Following comprehensive database searches, ten articles were included in the analysis. Epistemological and ontological considerations, the influence of decisions made in the practical application of pluralism, and approaches to interpreting findings produced from multiple analyses are discussed, and implications for future research are considered.

AB - Recent interest in analytical pluralism—the application of more than one qualitative analytical method to a single data set—has demonstrated its potential to produce multiple, complex, and varied understandings of phenomena. However, tensions remain regarding the commensurability of findings produced from diverse theoretical frameworks, the practical application of multiple methods of analysis, and the capacity of pluralism to contribute to knowledge in psychology. This study addresses these issues through a critical interpretation of existing qualitative studies that utilized analytical pluralism. Using a meta-study design, we examined the use of theory, application of methods, and production of findings in studies that had adopted qualitative analytical pluralism. Following comprehensive database searches, ten articles were included in the analysis. Epistemological and ontological considerations, the influence of decisions made in the practical application of pluralism, and approaches to interpreting findings produced from multiple analyses are discussed, and implications for future research are considered.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.948980

U2 - 10.1080/14780887.2014.948980

DO - 10.1080/14780887.2014.948980

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 182

EP - 201

JO - Qualitative Research in Psychology

JF - Qualitative Research in Psychology

SN - 1478-0887

IS - 2

ER -