Analysis of submissions to the EU's public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features

Allen William Andrew Gallagher, Karen Evans-Reeves, Ayush Joshi, Jenny Hatchard, Anna B. Gilmore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Background: The Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products requires all parties to establish a tobacco track and trace (T&T) system. In 2016, the European Commission held a public consultation on T&T implementation where parties were asked to respond online to 22 multiple-choice questions and were given additional opportunities to leave comments. In May 2019, the European Union's (EU) T&T system became operational. This paper explores tobacco industry influence over and policy positions within the consultation process. Methods: We identified consultation respondents and investigated any financial links with the tobacco industry and if these were transparent. Respondent's answers to the consultation's multiple-choice questions were collated to explore whether industry-linked respondents held the same policy positions as transnational tobacco companies (TTCs). Associations between policy positions and respondent's financial link status were tested using χ2 and Cranmer's V tests. Findings: Of the 197 consultation respondents identified, 131 (66.4%) had financial links to the industry; 29 (22.1%) were not transparent about these links. A large number of trade associations responded (87), the majority of which (74/87) had financial links to the industry. There was a clear divide in the policy preferences of respondents with and without a financial link. Collectively, respondents with a financial link supported an industry-operated T&T solution. Conclusions: There was an extensive lobbying effort by the tobacco industry over the EU's T&T system, with TTCs' interests being represented repeatedly through multiple trade associations. The transparency requirements regarding consultation respondents' affiliations with relevant stakeholders (eg, tobacco manufacturers) should be improved for future consultations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e4-e9
JournalTobacco Control
Volume30
Early online date6 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Nov 2021

Keywords

  • Illegal tobacco products
  • packaging and labelling
  • public policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of submissions to the EU's public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this